within 15 miles of Basalt Colorado


The Matthew C. Ferguson Law Firm, P.C.

Litigation, Arbitration, Complex Litigation, Real Estate, Construction

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Law Office of Josh L. Nordan

Business, Banking & Finance, Contract, Transactions, Insurance

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Cummins and Krulewitch

Criminal, Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Law Office Of William G. Argeros

Accident & Injury, Litigation, Contract, Business, Real Estate

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Law Office Of D Shackelford Shipp Attorney At Law

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Transportation & Shipping

Mark S. Rubinstein, P.C.

DUI-DWI, Car Accident, Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Zeluff & Associates

Tax, Family Law, Wills & Probate, Estate, International

The Law Office Adam Fink LLC

Real Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Business

Mark Uhlfelder, Esq.

General Practice

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Hassler v. ACCOUNT BROKERS OF LARIMER CTY.

... Rather, it directs the consumer debtor to contact the secured party "to learn the exact amount you must pay." By contrast, before a debt obligation under a consumer credit transaction may be accelerated under the Consumer Credit Code, the creditor must provide the actual ...

Bonidy v. VAIL VALLEY CENTER FOR AES. DENT.

... 494, 505 (DND1976) (Title VII back pay period ended 285 on date of judgment); Filter Specialists, 906 NE2d at 850 (employment discrimination case determining the back pay period runs from the date of discharge to the date of the decision). ...

In re Marriage of Thornhill

... Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals' holding that there is no per se rule against marketability discounts in the divorce context and hold that it is within the trial court's discretion to apply a marketability discount when valuing a spouse's ownership interest in a closely held ...