within 2 miles of Midland practice in Immigration Michigan

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


In re B and J

... Before these issues could be remedied, however, respondents were detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials [2] and deported to Guatemala. It is evident from the record that petitioner, itself, reported respondents to ICE. ...

People v. BUTIRUS

... Subsequently, the United States Supreme Court held that a criminal defense attorney must "advise a noncitizen client that pending criminal charges may carry a risk of adverse immigration consequences." Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 US ___, 130 S.Ct. ...

People v. Gomez

... The issue on appeal is whether Padilla v Kentucky, ___ US ___; 130 S Ct 1473; 176 L Ed 2d 284 (2010), applies retroactively to allow defendant to avoid the potential immigration consequences of his plea-based conviction. ...