2. within 300 miles of Temecula practice in Intellectual Property California

within 300 miles of Temecula practice in Intellectual Property California


  SPONSORED LAWYERS

41-50 of 4049 matches. Page 5 of 405  

Nash & Nash

Corporate, Business Organization, Contract, Estate Planning, Intellectual Property

CONTACT
401 Via Corta, Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274

Feldman Gale PA

Leisure, Intellectual Property, Internet, Litigation, Patent

CONTACT
Promenade West,880 West First Street,Suite 315, Los Angeles, CA 90012

Anderson Mcpharlin & Conners LLP

Employment, Other, Intellectual Property, Business, Contract

CONTACT
444 South Flower Street,31st Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071

Fulwider Patton LLP

Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark, Business, Industry Specialties

CONTACT
Howard Hughes Center,6060 Center Drive,Tenth Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90045

Hankin Patent Law A Professional Corporation

Patent, Trademark, Intellectual Property

CONTACT
6404 Wilshire Boulevard,Suite 1020, Los Angeles, CA 90048

Goldstein Law Offices PC

Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark

CONTACT
8383 Wilshire Boulevard,Suite 336, Beverly Hills, CA 90211

The Law Offices Of Melissa K Dagodag

Trademark, Leisure, Business, Intellectual Property, Industry Specialties

CONTACT
718 North Harper Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90046

Trojan Law Offices

Copyright, Intellectual Property, International Intellectual Property, Patent, Science, Technology & Internet

CONTACT
9250 Wilshire Blvd.,Suite 325, Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Rutter Hobbs & Davidoff Inc

Corporate, Securities, Patent, Land Use & Zoning, Science, Technology & Internet

CONTACT
1901 Avenue of the Stars,Suite 1700, Los Angeles, CA 90067

Law Offices Of James W Spertus

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Lawsuit & Dispute, Intellectual Property

CONTACT
1990 S Bundy Dr,Suite 705, Los Angeles, CA 90025
Member Representative

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

City of Hope Nat. Med. Center v. Genentech

... supra, 107 Cal.App.4th 25, 130 Cal.Rptr.2d 860, that fiduciary obligations are not necessarily created when one party entrusts valuable intellectual property to another for commercial development in exchange for the payment of compensation contingent on commercial success. ...

FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Parrish

... In 2004, FLIR purchased Indigo for approximately $185 million, acquiring Indigo's patents, technology, and intellectual property. ... The production startup time would be quick, assuming respondents could acquire technology licenses and intellectual property from a third party. ...

KC Multimedia, Inc. v. Bank of America Technology & Operations, Inc.

... (Ibid.) "The stated purpose of the UTSA is to provide `unitary definitions of trade secret and trade secret misappropriation, and a single statute of limitations for the various property, quasi-contractual, and violation of fiduciary relationship theories of noncontractual liability utilized ...

FIND A LAWYER:


Advanced Search


REFINE BY DISTANCE

PRACTICE AREAS