Springville DUI-DWI Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Ara Aghishian
About | Practice Areas
Aghishian Law Corporation
16133 Ventura Blvd 7th Floor Encino, CA 91436» view map
Criminal Defense
30 Years Of Experience

Attorney Aghishian's in-depth experience and appreciation for the State of California make him uniquely qualified to advocate for the rights of his fellow Californian clients.

800-741-7170
1. Ara Aghishian Encino, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 1987
  Glendale University J.D. 1985
2. AboutAghishian Law Corporation
  Your advocate when you need it most.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Springville DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Springville Criminal lawyers.

Martin Malkasian

DUI-DWI, Litigation, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2912 West Main Street, Visalia, CA 93291

Robert Erbar Vanderhorst

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

Porterville, CA 93258

Robert Krase

Other, Real Estate, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

132 E Morton Ave, Porterville, CA 93257

David Lange

Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

720 W. Center Avenue, Visalia, CA 93291

Greg Hagopian

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Animal Bite

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

115 S Church St, Visalia, CA 93291

Christopher Lionel Haberman

Other, Criminal, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

113 N Church St, Visalia, CA 93291

Kenn Allen Bovetti

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

204 N Floral, Visalia, CA 93291

David Wayne Allen

Family Law, Adoption, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

805 W Main St, Visalia, CA 93291

Andrew James Stark

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

221 S Mooney Blvd, Visalia, CA 93291

Ronald Allen Westphal

Criminal, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

221 S Mooney Blvd, Visalia, CA 93291

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

GREEN CARD

The well-known term for an Alien Registration Receipt Card. This plastic photo identification card is given to individuals who are legal permanent residents of ... (more...)

The well-known term for an Alien Registration Receipt Card. This plastic photo identification card is given to individuals who are legal permanent residents of the United States. It serves as a U.S. entry document in place of a visa, enabling permanent residents to return to the United States after temporary absences. The key characteristic of a green card is that it allows the holder to live permanently in the United States. Unless you abandon your residence or violate certain criminal or immigration laws, your green card can never be taken away. Possession of a green card also allows you to work in the United States legally. Those who hold green cards for a certain length of time may eventually apply for U.S. citizenship. Green cards have an expiration date of ten years from issuance. This does not mean that your permanent resident status expires. You must simply apply for a new card.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CONSTABLE

A peace officer for a particular geographic area -- most often a rural county -- who commonly has the power to serve legal papers, arrest lawbreakers and keep t... (more...)

A peace officer for a particular geographic area -- most often a rural county -- who commonly has the power to serve legal papers, arrest lawbreakers and keep the peace. Depending on the state, a constable may be similar to a marshal or sheriff.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. McNeal

... liquor" in violation of the generic DUI law. (Id., 772 A.2d at pp. 1088, 1091.) The Vermont Supreme Court agreed. (Id. at p. 1091.) The court observed that "any evidence raising a doubt as to [the] defendant's condition, which is the ultimate question in a generic DWI prosecution . ...

People v. Landon

... OPINION. LAMBDEN, J.â€”. On August 14, 2008, defendant pleaded guilty to driving under the influence (DUI) with a blood-alcohol level greater than 0.08 percent (Veh. Code, Â§ 23152, subd. (b)); she admitted four prior DUI 1099 convictions. ...

People v. Patel

... In exchange for a grant of probation, defendant Javid Patel entered negotiated pleas of no contest to alternative felony counts of "generic" and "per se" [1] negligent driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) that resulted in bodily injury to another, and a misdemeanor count of ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Springville DUI-DWI Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Aghishian Law Corporation

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Martin Malkasian

Robert Erbar Vanderhorst

Robert Krase

David Lange

Greg Hagopian

Christopher Lionel Haberman

Kenn Allen Bovetti

David Wayne Allen

Andrew James Stark

Ronald Allen Westphal

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

GREEN CARD

LARCENY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

CAPITAL CASE

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CONSTABLE

JURY NULLIFICATION

PLEA

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. McNeal

People v. Landon

People v. Patel

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details