Worthington Felony Lawyer, Massachusetts

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Adam Beck
About | Practice Areas
Adam P. Beck, M.D., Esq.
25 Marston St Suite 303 Lawrence, MA 01841» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Legal Expertise You Can Rely On

By working with lawyers who are also doctors, clients can benefit from advocates who have a deeper understanding of their physical injuries, medical needs, and prognoses.

800-383-8491
1. Adam Beck Lawrence, MA
  Attorney at Law- MA, 2010
  Massachusetts School of Law, J.D. 2010
2. AboutAdam P. Beck, M.D., Esq.
  Legal Expertise You Can Rely On
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Worthington Felony lawyer.
Below are all Worthington Criminal lawyers.

Joseph M. Pacella

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Personal Injury, Land Use & Zoning

We'll Fight for Your Rights

Having tried several hundred cases, I can certainly argue any set of facts; after more than 20 years in practice, I am confident that I know evidence ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-931-4481

1380 Main Street, Springfield, MA 01103

Peter C. Alessio

Personal Injury, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

82 Joan Drive, Pittsfield, MA 01201

Robert H. Astor

Dispute Resolution, Arbitration, Criminal, Animal Bite

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

564 Burts Pit Rd, Florence, MA 01062

Andrew T. Campoli

Insurance, Personal Injury, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: Inactive

CONTACT

Pittsfield, MA 01202

Marissa Elkins

Criminal, Civil Rights, Motor Vehicle, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

31 trumbull Road, Northampton, MA 01060

Thomas L. Campoli

Landlord-Tenant, Criminal, Insurance, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

27 Willis Street, Pittsfield, MA 01201

Leonard H. Cohen

Traffic, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

28 North Street, Pittsfield, MA 01201

Mark Allan Tanner

Real Estate, Health Care, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

31 Trumbull Road, Northampton, MA 01060

Richard D. Leblanc

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

252 Allengate Ave, Pittsfield, MA 01201

William C. Newman

Power of Attorney, Employee Rights, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

61 Lyman Road, Northampton, MA 01060

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CRIME

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defin... (more...)

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defined by Congress and state legislatures.

BAILIFF

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to mai... (more...)

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to maintain order in the courtroom. In addition, bailiffs often help court proceedings go smoothly by shepherding witnesses in and out of the courtroom and handing evidence to witnesses as they testify. In criminal cases, the bailiff may have temporary charge of any defendant who is in custody during court proceedings.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Gunter

... Paul Gunter was convicted of murder in the first degree on a theory of felony-murder, in violation of GL c. 265, Â§ 1; armed assault in a dwelling with intent to commit a felony, in violation of GL c. 265, Â§ 18A; and illegal possession of a firearm, in violation of GL c. 269, Â§ 10 (a). This ...

Commonwealth v. Womack

... Catherine Langevin Semel, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth. SPINA, J. The defendant was convicted of felony-murder in the first degree. The underlying felony was an armed robbery while masked. The defendant appealed. ...

Commonwealth v. Young

... relief in both cases from a single justice of this court pursuant to GL c. 211, Â§ 3, contending that possessory firearm offenses come within Â§ 58A (1), which permits the Commonwealth to move for pretrial detention if a defendant has been charged with "any other felony that by its ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Worthington Felony Lawyer, Massachusetts

Sponsored Law Firm

Adam P. Beck, M.D., Esq.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Joseph M. Pacella

Peter C. Alessio

Robert H. Astor

Andrew T. Campoli

Marissa Elkins

Thomas L. Campoli

Leonard H. Cohen

Mark Allan Tanner

Richard D. Leblanc

William C. Newman

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-DEFENSE

IMPEACH

PROSECUTE

JURY

NOLLE PROSEQUI

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CRIME

BAILIFF

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Gunter

Commonwealth v. Womack

Commonwealth v. Young

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details