Alum Creek RICO Act Lawyer, West Virginia

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Claude S. Smith, III
About | Practice Areas
The Law Offices of Claude S. Smith III
805 Bigley Avenue Charleston, WV 25302» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Working With Clients One On One

As your attorney, I will make sure you know that I am here for you. I will keep you updated on your case as it progresses.

800-936-8471
1. Claude S. Smith, III Charleston, WV
  Attorney at Law - WV, 1992
  University of Houston J.D. 1989
2. AboutThe Law Offices of Claude S. Smith III
  Working With Clients One On One
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Alum Creek RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Alum Creek Criminal lawyers.

Ronald N. Walters

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt, Family Law, Trusts

Ron has, over the last decade, assisted clients by planning and designing settlements to address future needs and ensure any government benefits are p... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-895-9790

16 Capitol St, Charleston, WV 25301

Claude S. Smith, III

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Personal Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Whether you have suffered an accident while on the job or suffered an injury during a car accident or semi truck accident, The Law Offices of Claude S... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-936-8471

805 Bigley Avenue, Charleston, WV 25302

Traci L. Wiley

Criminal, Colleges & Universities, Commercial Insurance, Construction Contracts

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

James Mark Building, 901 Quarrier Street, Charleston, WV 25301

Jason S. Lord

Animal Bite, Criminal, Bed Bug, Defamation & Slander

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

405 Capitol Street, Charleston, WV 25301

Bryan N. Price

Criminal, Consumer Protection, Contract, Consumer Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

James Mark Building, 901 Quarrier Street, Charleston, WV 25301

Todd M. Sponseller

Criminal, Deceptive Trade Practices, Employment, Environmental Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

500 Virginia Street, East, Charleston, WV 25301

Christine D. Wallace

Adoption, Alimony & Spousal Support, Animal Bite, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

405 Capitol Street, Charleston, WV 25301

Carrie Webster

Criminal, Family Law, Insurance, Mediation

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

213 Hale Street, Charleston, WV 25301

Jacqueline Ann Hallinan

Bad Faith Insurance, Civil Rights, Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

100 Capitol Street, Charleston, WV 25301

John B. Carrico

Criminal, Estate Planning, Family Law, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1412 Kanawha Boulevard East, Charleston, WV 25301

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Alum Creek RICO Act Lawyer, West Virginia

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Claude S. Smith III

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Ronald N. Walters

Claude S. Smith, III

Traci L. Wiley

Jason S. Lord

Bryan N. Price

Todd M. Sponseller

Christine D. Wallace

Carrie Webster

Jacqueline Ann Hallinan

John B. Carrico

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BAIL

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

WARRANT

BURDEN OF PROOF

DIRECTED VERDICT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

IMPEACH

INSANITY

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details