Amherst County, VA Misdemeanor Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Seth Price
About | Practice Areas
Price Benowitz LLP
409 7Th St Nw Suite 200 Washington, DC 20004Â» view map
Criminal Law
Working Relentlessly For You

Our firm was built on the understanding that comprehensive representation does not begin and end in the courtroom.

202-600-9400
1. Seth Price Washington, DC
  Attorney at Law-DC,1996
  G. W. University Law School
2. AboutPrice Benowitz LLP
  Working Relentlessly for You
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Amherst Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Amherst lawyers.

J. Thompson Shrader

Family Law, Banking & Finance, Wills & Probate, Construction

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

330 South Main Street, Amherst, VA 24521

Steven Kirk Wilder

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

235 Winton Hills Dr, Amherst, VA 24521

Dean Rodgers

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

153 Washington Street, Amherst, VA 24521

Thomas P. Loftus

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

1669 Kenmore Rd, Amherst, VA 24521

Brianne Morcom Sullenger

Litigation, Trusts, Wrongful Termination, Consumer Rights, Power of Attorney

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

617 Woodland Drive, Madison Heights, VA 24572

Cynthia Lee Foulke

Lawsuit & Dispute

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Amherst, VA 24521

William Lyle Carver

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Amherst, VA 24521

Spencer Christian Drake

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Amherst, VA 24521

Troy Nicks

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

Amherst, VA 24521

Robert Clemm Goad

Real Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Amherst, VA 24521

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Abdullah v. Com.

... RANDOLPH A. BEALES, Judge. The trial judge convicted Akili Amin Abdullah (appellant) of robbery, in violation of Code Â§ 18.2-58, and misdemeanor assault while part of a mob, in violation of Code Â§ 18.2-42. ... B. MISDEMEANOR ASSAULT WHILE PART OF A MOB. ...

Wade v. Com.

... POWELL, Judge. Nikkol Irene Wade (appellant) appeals from her conviction for misdemeanor destruction of property, in violation of Code Â§ 18.2-137. ... ANALYSIS. The issue in this case is whether a person may be convicted of a misdemeanor as a principal in the second degree. ...

Woody v. Com.

... a warrant on the driving while intoxicated charge. The warrant recited that Woody was charged with a "Misdemeanor (Local)" and that Amherst County was the prosecuting entity. The warrant further alleged that Woody "did unlawfully ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Amherst County, VA Misdemeanor Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

Price Benowitz LLP

SPONSORED LAWYERS

J. Thompson Shrader

Steven Kirk Wilder

Dean Rodgers

Thomas P. Loftus

Brianne Morcom Sullenger

Cynthia Lee Foulke

William Lyle Carver

Spencer Christian Drake

Troy Nicks

Robert Clemm Goad

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

NOLLE PROSEQUI

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

ARREST WARRANT

HOT PURSUIT

BURDEN OF PROOF

ACQUITTAL

SELF-DEFENSE

VENIREMEN

INFORMED CONSENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Abdullah v. Com.

Wade v. Com.

Woody v. Com.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details