Anacortes Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jason Newcombe
About Us | Services
The Law Offices of Jason S. Newcombe
Proudly Serving The Greater Puget Sound RegionÂ» view map
Criminal Defense, DWI/DUI, Misdemeanor
CONTACT US FOR A CONSULTATION

Our Washington State lawyers have the resources, the knowledge, and the experience to assist you with your legal matter in our practice areas.

800-699-2370
1. Jason Newcombe Seattle, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 1999
  Boston College Law School, J.D. - 1997
2. About UsServing Washington
  Offices in Seattle, Bellevue, Tacoma, Everett, and Olympia
3. ServicesExperienced Attorneys
  We always offer a free initial consultation and case evaluation
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert Stephen Jones

Lawsuit & Dispute, Patent, Criminal, Identity Theft

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

Anacortes, WA 98221

Rebecca Kathleen Carroll

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

Anacortes, WA 98221

Paula M. Plumer

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Criminal, Indians & Native Populations

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

Anacortes, WA 98221

Julie Christina Walters

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

1010 34Th St, Anacortes, WA 98221

Justin Rylan Campbell

Traffic, Federal, Criminal, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

1101 8Th St, Anacortes, WA 98221

Colleen Sue Kenimond

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

1608 36Th St, Anacortes, WA 98221

Lisa Danette Paul

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

1415 Commercial Ave, Anacortes, WA 98221

Mark Kirby Roe

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

1415 Commercial Ave, Anacortes, WA 98221

Lisa Danette Paul

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

1415 Commercial Ave, Anacortes, WA 98221

Laura Lee Tuttle

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

1409 41St St, Anacortes, WA 98221

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BAILIFF

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to mai... (more...)

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to maintain order in the courtroom. In addition, bailiffs often help court proceedings go smoothly by shepherding witnesses in and out of the courtroom and handing evidence to witnesses as they testify. In criminal cases, the bailiff may have temporary charge of any defendant who is in custody during court proceedings.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Anacortes Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Jason S. Newcombe

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert Stephen Jones

Rebecca Kathleen Carroll

Paula M. Plumer

Julie Christina Walters

Justin Rylan Campbell

Colleen Sue Kenimond

Lisa Danette Paul

Mark Kirby Roe

Lisa Danette Paul

Laura Lee Tuttle

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA BARGAIN

INFORMED CONSENT

EAVESDROPPING

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

CIVIL

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BAILIFF

ACTUS REUS

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details