Beavercreek DUI-DWI Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory Oliveros
About | Practice Areas
Oliveros Law Group, P.C.
9200 S.E. Sunnybrook Boulevard Suite 335 Clackamas, OR 97015» view map
Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
007 Law

At Oliveros Law Group P.C, our attorneys help clients understand their rights when they have been injured due to the deliberate or careless act of another person.

800-797-7891
1. Gregory Oliveros Clackamas, OR
  Attorney at Law - OR, 1990
  Lewis & Clark Law School J.D. 1990
2. AboutOliveros Law Group, P.C.
  007 Law
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Mark R. Bailey

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

294 Warner Milne Road, Oregon City, OR 97045

Jared Justice

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Oregon City, OR 97045

John H Hingson

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Oregon City, OR 97045

John Henry Hingson

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Oregon City, OR 97045

Edward O'Branniga Lee

Immigration, Trusts, DUI-DWI, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

16219 Jada Way, Oregon City, OR 97045

Cierra D. Brown

Land Use & Zoning, Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

421 High St, Oregon City, OR 97045

Rhett L. Bernstein

Estate Planning, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Identity Theft

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

219 7Th St., West Linn, OR 97068

Rhett Bernstein

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

219 7Th St., West Linn, OR 97068

Michael F Czaiko

Traffic, Transportation & Shipping, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

217 7Th St, Oregon City, OR 97045

Shannon Iris Wilson

Other, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

708 Main Street, Oregon City, OR 97045

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

PUBLIC DEFENDER

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and ar... (more...)

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and are unable to pay for their own defense.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kruse

184 P.3d 1182 (2008). 220 Or. App. 38. STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jay Lynn KRUSE, Defendant-Appellant. D055973M, D060612T, A132038 (Control), A132039. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted January 4, 2008. Decided May 14, 2008. ...

State v. Machuca

227 P.3d 729 (2010). 347 Or. 644. STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review, v. Thomas Gregory MACHUCA, Respondent on Review. (CC 050647097; CA A133362; SC S057910). Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc. Argued and Submitted December 16, 2009. ...

Prior v. Department of Revenue

... [2]. In her Complaint, Plaintiff asserts that the Department is in error in withholding the tax refund to pay for her "husband's DUI[,] [because] I have be[en] separated from him for 6 y[ea]rs and have nothing to do with his affairs or finances." [3] (Ptf's Compl at 1, Sec. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Beavercreek DUI-DWI Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

Oliveros Law Group, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Mark R. Bailey

Jared Justice

John H Hingson

John Henry Hingson

Edward O'Branniga Lee

Cierra D. Brown

Rhett L. Bernstein

Rhett Bernstein

Michael F Czaiko

Shannon Iris Wilson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

MENS REA

NOLLE PROSEQUI

SPECIFIC INTENT

ACTUS REUS

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

PUBLIC DEFENDER

LINEUP

FEDERAL COURT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kruse

State v. Machuca

Prior v. Department of Revenue

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details