Bethel Island RICO Act Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jo-Anna Nieves
About | Practice Areas
The Nieves Law Firm
505 14th St. Ste. 900 Oakland, CA 94612Â» view map
Criminal Defense
We Take The Criminal Out Of Criminal Defense

We are energetic, creative, and aggressive in our efforts to extricate you from your situation and help you get your life back on track.

800-681-5480
1. Jo-Anna Nieves Oakland, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 2011
  Florida State University J.D. 2011
2. AboutThe Nieves Law Firm
  When you are charged with a criminal offense, you need a strong, experienced, and committed advocate.
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Bethel Island RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Bethel Island Criminal lawyers.

Jeffrey A Silvia

Employment, White Collar Crime, Products Liability, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2800 West March Lane, Stockton, CA 95219

Horace Joseph Siino

Real Estate, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 57 Years

CONTACT

2335 Cathy Ct, Brentwood, CA 94513

Stephanie Michele Defonte

DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

1191 Central Blvd, Brentwood, CA 94513

Reve Gerardo Bautista

Traffic, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

613 1St St, Brentwood, CA 94513

David Jeffry Larsen

Lawsuit, Immigration, Child Custody, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

5179 Lone Tree Way, Antioch, CA 94531

Avninder Singh Sohal

Trusts, Criminal, Corporate, Commercial Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2819 W March Lane, Stockton, CA 95219

Donald Boyette Lundahl

Personal Injury, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: Deceased Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

2028 Asilomar Dr, Antioch, CA 94509

Peter Christopher Pappas

Real Estate, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

3105 Lone Tree Way, Antioch, CA 94509

Michael John Primus

Bankruptcy, Employment Discrimination, Personal Injury, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

511 W 3rd St, Antioch, CA 94509

Mellanese S. Lofton

Real Estate, Trusts, Estate, Criminal

Status: Suspended

CONTACT

Rio Vista, CA 94571

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Bethel Island RICO Act Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

The Nieves Law Firm

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jeffrey A Silvia

Horace Joseph Siino

Stephanie Michele Defonte

Reve Gerardo Bautista

David Jeffry Larsen

Avninder Singh Sohal

Donald Boyette Lundahl

Peter Christopher Pappas

Michael John Primus

Mellanese S. Lofton

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INDECENT EXPOSURE

DIRECTED VERDICT

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

NOLLE PROSEQUI

IMPEACH

SEARCH WARRANT

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

HABEAS CORPUS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details