Boston White Collar Crime Lawyer, Massachusetts

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Adam Beck
About | Practice Areas
Adam P. Beck, M.D., Esq.
25 Marston St Suite 303 Lawrence, MA 01841» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Legal Expertise You Can Rely On

By working with lawyers who are also doctors, clients can benefit from advocates who have a deeper understanding of their physical injuries, medical needs, and prognoses.

800-383-8491
1. Adam Beck Lawrence, MA
  Attorney at Law- MA, 2010
  Massachusetts School of Law, J.D. 2010
2. AboutAdam P. Beck, M.D., Esq.
  Legal Expertise You Can Rely On
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Joseph Simons

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, White Collar Crime, Felony, DUI-DWI

Offering high-quality criminal defense to people in Boston and throughout Massachusetts.

I help people in all walks of life, from doctors to CEOs to blue-collar workers. Whoever you are, if you're facing criminal charges, everything else ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-926-4450

10 Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109

R. Bradford Bailey

Criminal, Securities Regulation, White Collar Crime

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

Four Longfellow Place, Boston, MA 02114

Robert W Normandin

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Traffic, White Collar Crime

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

9 Central Street, Lowell, MA 01852

Frank A Yee

Employment, White Collar Crime, Criminal, Securities

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

9 Summer Street, Franklin, MA 02038

Christine Genaitis

Litigation, White Collar Crime, Medical Products & Devices

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

100 High Street, Boston, MA 02110

Robert A. A Stolzberg

Legal Malpractice, White Collar Crime, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 52 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

105 Willard. Rd., Brookline, MA 02445

Alex Hess

Litigation, Bankruptcy, White Collar Crime, Business & Trade

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

84 State Street, Boston, MA 02109

Peter T. Elikann

Sexual Harassment, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

80 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02108

Michael F. Connolly

Land Use & Zoning, Energy, Federal, White Collar Crime, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

-, Boston, MA 02111

Paul V. Kelly

Real Estate, Litigation, Employee Rights, White Collar Crime, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

75 Park Plaza, Boston, MA 02116

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Boston White Collar Crime Lawyer, Massachusetts

Sponsored Law Firm

Adam P. Beck, M.D., Esq.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Joseph Simons

R. Bradford Bailey

Robert W Normandin

Frank A Yee

Christine Genaitis

Robert A. A Stolzberg

Alex Hess

Peter T. Elikann

Michael F. Connolly

Paul V. Kelly

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY

DIRECTED VERDICT

INFORMED CONSENT

NOLO CONTENDERE

PLEA

JUSTICE SYSTEM

BURDEN OF PROOF

CRIMINAL INSANITY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details