Bryn Mawr Felony Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard Fuschino
About | Practice Areas
The Law Offices of Richard J. Fuschino Jr.
1600 Locust St Philadelphia, PA 19103» view map
Criminal Defense
Protecting Your Freedom and Your Reputation

Richard J. Fuschino has been defending people against criminal charges for most of his professional career.

800-973-5371
1. Richard Fuschino Philadelphia, PA
  Attorney at Law - PA, 2007
  University of Pittsburg
2. AboutThe Law Offices of Richard J. Fuschino Jr.
  Over 10 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Christopher Bokas

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Car Accident, Wrongful Death, DUI-DWI, Felony

Attorney Christopher Bokas handles all felonies and misdemeanors, including white collar crimes, juvenile crimes, drug offenses, parol and probation v... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-997-6550

20 West Third Street, Media, PA 19063

Zak Taylor Goldstein

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime

Philadelphia Criminal Defense Attorney

Zak Goldstein is a Philadelphia criminal defense and civil rights attorney. Zak Goldstein has experience trying hundreds of cases before judges and ju... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-356-3201

1717 Arch Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA 19107

Richard John Fuschino

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Felony, White Collar Crime, Federal Trial Practice, Federal Appellate Practice

Protecting Your Freedom and Your Reputation

If you are facing criminal charges in the Pennsylvania state or federal courts, you want a law firm with the experience, guts and the dedication to fi... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-951-3481

1600 Locust St, Philadelphia, PA 19103

Lauren A Wimmer

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Police Misconduct, Felony, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI

Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer

Attorney Lauren A. Wimmer has represented individuals charged in both state and federal court with charges ranging from misdemeanors like drug and var... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-417-0320

505 South Street, Philadelphia, PA 19147

Arik T. Benari

DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime, Misdemeanor, Felony

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

200 West Front Street, Media, PA 19063

Steve Edward Jarmon

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

24 E. Market Street, West Chester, PA 19381

Eric D. Strand

DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

27 S. Darlington St., West Chester, PA 19382

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CRIME

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defin... (more...)

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defined by Congress and state legislatures.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

PUBLIC DEFENDER

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and ar... (more...)

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and are unable to pay for their own defense.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Griffin

... The primary issue raised is whether Respondent's felony convictions for fraudulently procuring a credit card constitute "infamous crimes" for purposes of Article II, Section 7 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which prohibits anyone convicted of such an offense from holding an ...

Commonwealth v. Pantalion

... [4] Appellant asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in grading forgery of a money order as a second-degree felony. We hold Appellant's negotiation of a counterfeit United States Postal Service money order constituted ...

Commonwealth v. Graham

... The suppression court did not err. Â¶ 7 Appellant next argues the court erred by grading the burglary charge as a felony of the first degree because the structure at issue was not ... (c) Grading.â€”. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), burglary is a felony of the first degree. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Bryn Mawr Felony Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Richard J. Fuschino Jr.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Christopher Bokas

Zak Taylor Goldstein

Richard John Fuschino

Lauren A Wimmer

Arik T. Benari

Steve Edward Jarmon

Eric D. Strand

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CRIME

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

CORPUS DELECTI

CHARGE

PUBLIC DEFENDER

SEARCH WARRANT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Griffin

Commonwealth v. Pantalion

Commonwealth v. Graham

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details