LAWYER SEARCH
Fast & Free
LEGAL PLAN
Only $14.99/m
NEED A LAWYER?
800-620-0900
FOR LAWYERS
Membership Details
MY ACCOUNT
Login or Sign Up
Click Here to Connect with a Lawyer

Find a Lawyer for Your Case
Enter case details below and connect to a lawyer fast!

Your Name

Email

Phone Number

Case Location

Briefly Describe Your Case

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

Center Hill Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Joseph Gasparro
About | Practice Areas
Joseph A. Gasparro, PA
813 Jackson Rd Jacksonville, FL 32225» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Serving the Best Interests Of Our Clients

When you need accurate representation for criminal defense issues, Joseph Gasparro is there for you.

800-971-8621
1. Joseph Gasparro Jacksonville, FL
  Attorney at Law- FL, 2015
  Florida Coastal School of Law, J.D. 2015
2. AboutJoseph A. Gasparro, PA
  Serving the Best Interests Of Our Clients
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Timothy David Lucero Lawyer

Timothy David Lucero

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate

Timothy Lucero is a practicing lawyer in the state of Florida.

7965 State Road 50, Groveland, FL 34736

Christopher Lance Shropa

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 15 Years

416 N Lawrence St, Bushnell, FL 33513

Erin Jane Leathers

Employment, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

416 N Lawrence St, Bushnell, FL 33513

Terry James Roberts

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 7 Years

416 N Lawrence St, Bushnell, FL 33513

Paul Louie Militello

Credit & Debt, Trusts, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

215 E Mccollum Ave, Bushnell, FL 33513

Joseph Orlan Church

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

215 E Mccollum Ave, Bushnell, FL 33513

Joseph Orlan Church

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

215 E Mccollum Ave, Bushnell, FL 33513

Matthew Edward-Alexander Bryan

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

215 E Mccollum Ave, Bushnell, FL 33513

Keisha E Cason

Government, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

215 E Mccollum Ave, Bushnell, FL 33513

Daniel James Geraghty

Federal Trial Practice, Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

215 East Mccollum Avenue, Bushnell, FL 33513

Member Representative

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

... convictions for discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1000 feet of a person in violation of section 790.15(2), Florida Statutes (2003), and shooting into an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (2003), arising from the same criminal episode, violate ...

State v. Meshell

... 1) and for oral sex (Count 3) violated double jeopardy. Because these are distinct criminal acts, we agree with the State that there is no double jeopardy violation. Although the Fifth District reversed the trial court's judgment, holding ...

Jackson v. State

... CANTERO, J. In this case, we decide whether a trial court's consideration, for sentencing purposes, of victim impact testimony without defense counsel present is a sentencing error as contemplated by rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended