Clawson Criminal Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Michael Hepworth
Tyler Call | Tanner Clagett
Hepworth & Associates
Serving all of Utah » view map
Utah Criminal Lawyers
Things Get Better From Here

Providing professional and compassionate representation in various criminal cases. Hepworth & Associates are tough, strong and fair attorneys.

800-625-0860
1. Michael Hepworth Bountiful, UT
  Attorney At Law - Utah
  Sturm College of Law, J.D. - 2014
2. Tyler Call Bountiful, UT
  Attorney At Law - UT, 2015
  U of Oregon, J.D. - 2014
3. M. Tanner Clagett Bountiful, UT
  Attorney At Law - UT, 2016
  U of Denver, J.D. - 2014
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Clawson Criminal lawyer.
Below are all Clawson lawyers.

Brock E Johansen

Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

445 E Sr 29, Orangeville, UT 84537

David M Allred

Family Law, Adoption

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

635 S. Main St., Orangeville, UT 84537

Tracy R Justesen

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

185 East Center Street, Orangeville, UT 84537

Michael D Olsen

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

1850 North Des Bee Dove Road, Castle Dale, UT 84513

Allen S Thorpe

General Practice

Status: Deceased Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

Castle Dale, UT 84513

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Salt Lake City v. Bench

... 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)). It is initially justified if a police officer has a reasonable suspicion, prior to the stop, that a person is engaging in, or has engaged in, criminal behavior. See id.; Utah Code Ann. ... 2. Details About the Observed Criminal Conduct. ...

State v. Lane

... 4 On July 15, 2005, criminal charges were filed against Lane, including two counts of negligent homicide, a class A misdemeanor. ... 16 A victim is not a party to a criminal case and is not afforded the right to appeal the dismissal of a criminal judgment. ...

State v. Valdez

... BILLINGS, Judge: Â¶ 1 Defendant Patrick Henry Valdez was charged in five different informations based on separate criminal episodes with two second degree felonies, four third degree felonies, and seven misdemeanors, primarily related to various burglaries. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Clawson Criminal Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

Hepworth & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Brock E Johansen

David M Allred

Tracy R Justesen

Michael D Olsen

Allen S Thorpe

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CIVIL

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

HABEAS CORPUS

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

ACQUITTAL

ARRAIGNMENT

SELF-DEFENSE

GRAND JURY

CORPUS DELECTI

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Salt Lake City v. Bench

State v. Lane

State v. Valdez

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details