Coconino County, AZ Misdemeanor Lawyers, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Zachary Mushkatel
About | Practice Areas
Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
15249 N. 99th Ave Sun City, AZ 85351» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Get Solutions To Your Legal Problems

At Mushkatel, Robbins & Becker, PLLC, our goal is to provide you with a comfortable environment where you can get trusted guidance on the legal matters affecting your life.

800-895-6240
1. Zachary Mushkatel Sun City, AZ
  Attorney at Law - AZ, 2004
  University of Minnesota J.D. 2004
2. AboutMushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
  Dedicated to Justice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Coconino Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Coconino lawyers.

Ted S. Reed

Business Organization, Family Law, Wills & Probate, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

624 Beaver St, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Andrew Graham

Personal Injury, Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

110 E. Cherry Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Jennifer M Mott

Environmental Law, Family Law, Bankruptcy, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

123 N San Francisco St, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Bryon Middlebrook

Traffic, Lawsuit & Dispute, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

308 N Agassiz St, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Jeffrey D Dollins

Other, State Government, Public Schools, Employee Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Jared E Holland

Litigation, Trusts, Business & Trade, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

15 E Cherry Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Elliot Randal Alford

Immigration, Family Law, Divorce, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3 N Leroux St, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Kathryn Grace Mahady

Immigration, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

123 N San Francisco St, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

James David Griffith

Estate Planning, Indians & Native Populations, Civil Rights, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Aaron Mathew Hall

Criminal, Indians & Native Populations, Wrongful Death, Contract

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

405 N Beaver St, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Fushek v. State

... OPINION. HURWITZ, Justice. Â¶ 1 This case requires us to decide whether the Arizona Constitution guarantees a jury trial to a misdemeanor defendant when the State files a special allegation of sexual motivation pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes ("ARS") Â§ 13-118 (2001). I. ...

State v. Garcia

... OPINION. GEMMILL, Judge. Â¶ 1 The State of Arizona appeals the trial court's designation of defendant Felipe A. Garcia's conviction for disorderly conduct as a class 1 misdemeanor. ... Disorderly conduct under subsection A, paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 is a class 1 misdemeanor."). ...

State v. Russell

... The trial court correctly held, however, that a felony offense remains a felony unless and until a court designates it a misdemeanor after conviction. ... We disagree. I. A trial court may designate a class 6 felony as a misdemeanor only after conviction of the felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Coconino County, AZ Misdemeanor Lawyers, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Ted S. Reed

Andrew Graham

Jennifer M Mott

Bryon Middlebrook

Jeffrey D Dollins

Jared E Holland

Elliot Randal Alford

Kathryn Grace Mahady

James David Griffith

Aaron Mathew Hall

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INDECENT EXPOSURE

NOLLE PROSEQUI

PROSECUTE

ARREST

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

ASSAULT

DIRECTED VERDICT

HUNG JURY

HOT PURSUIT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Fushek v. State

State v. Garcia

State v. Russell

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details