Dayton Consumer Protection Lawyer, Washington


Includes: Warranties, Recreational Products

G. Scott Marinella

Land Use & Zoning, Litigation, Federal, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  41 Years

Matthew Robert Johnson

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  10 Years

C Dale Slack

State Government, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  18 Years

Keith O Yates

General Practice
Status:  Inactive           Licensed:  75 Years

Charles Hubbard Thronson

Criminal
Status:  Inactive           Licensed:  50 Years

Edwin J Stanfill

General Practice
Status:  Deceased           Licensed:  81 Years

Cathlin Donohue

Land Use & Zoning, Family Law, Federal, Criminal
Status:  Deceased           Licensed:  26 Years

Randell O'Neil Lewis

Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  47 Years

Ward Conrad Hoskins

General Practice
Status:  Inactive           Licensed:  60 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Dayton Consumer Protection Lawyers and Dayton Consumer Protection Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Consumer Rights areas including Identity Theft attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McKee v. AT & T CORP.

... 3 After his individual attempts to resolve his billing issues with AT & T failed, McKee filed this class action lawsuit, alleging violations of Washington's Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW, and Washington's 849 usury statute, chapter 19.52 RCW, as well as negligence ...

Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy

... Michael sued Bright Now and Dr. Mosquera-Lacy for Consumer Protection Act (CPA) violations. The trial court dismissed the complaint on summary judgment. ... "[L]earned professions are not exempt from application of the Consumer Protection Act." Quimby v. Fine, 45 Wash. ...

Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Washington

... MADSEN, J. ¶ 1 These consolidated cases present the issue whether the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), chapter 19.86 RCW, applies to a collection agency's allegedly deceptive efforts to collect on an insurance company's subrogation claim against an underinsured motorist. ...