Eagle Lake Juvenile Law Lawyer, Texas, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Robert Jones
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Robert R. Jones III
2411 Emancipation Ave, Suite 202, Houston, TX 77004Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Expert Representation for Reasonable Rates

If you need representation, call me 24/7.

800-883-8760
1. Robert Jones San Antonio, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 2014
  South Texas College of Law J.D. 2011
2. AboutLaw Office of Robert R. Jones III
  Call me 24/7--Reasonable Rates
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Mandana Mahmoudi

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

301 Jackson St, Richmond, TX 77469

Bryan Kyle Everett

Elder Law, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Wills

Status: Inactive Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

4826 Kendalia Cloud Ln, Fulshear, TX 77441

Kasey Adamek Doggett

Commercial Real Estate, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal, Business & Trade

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

201 S 11Th St, Richmond, TX 77469

James Christian Becerra

Other, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

1422 Eugene Heimann Cir, Richmond, TX 77469

Kenneth Wayne Bryant

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Criminal, Collection, Child Custody

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

301 S 9Th St, Richmond, TX 77469

Toni Michelle Wallace

Juvenile Law, Wills, Criminal, Credit & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

1422 Eugene Heimann Cir, Richmond, TX 77469

Frances A Arzu

Juvenile Law, Other, Wills, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

515 Austin St, Richmond, TX 77469

Steven Scott Martinez

Other, Wills, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

Richmond, TX 77406

John Joseph Harrity

Juvenile Law, Other, State Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

301 Jackson St, Richmond, TX 77469

Ralph L. Gonzalez

Juvenile Law, Other, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

905 Front St, Richmond, TX 77469

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Meadoux v. State

... [2]. On direct appeal, Meadoux argued, for the first time, that the prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments contained in the Eighth Amendment barred the State from subjecting a juvenile capital offender to imprisonment for life without parole. ...

In re Hall

... In this original mandamus proceeding, we must decide whether an indigent person, adjudicated a juvenile delinquent as a minor and sentenced to forty years, has a 926 statutory right under the Juvenile Justice Code to the appointment of an attorney in a habeas corpus ...

In re FD

245 SW3d 110 (2008). In the Matter of FD, a Juvenile. No. 05-06-01712-CV. ... 112 Background. FD pleaded guilty in juvenile court to two counts of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. He was committed to TYC on September 10, 2003, when he was seventeen years old. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Eagle Lake Juvenile Law Lawyer, Texas, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Robert R. Jones III

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Mandana Mahmoudi

Bryan Kyle Everett

Kasey Adamek Doggett

James Christian Becerra

Kenneth Wayne Bryant

Toni Michelle Wallace

Frances A Arzu

Steven Scott Martinez

John Joseph Harrity

Ralph L. Gonzalez

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EAVESDROPPING

MCNAGHTEN RULE

FEDERAL COURT

CONVICTION

HOMICIDE

MISTRIAL

PLEA

BURDEN OF PROOF

SPECIFIC INTENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Meadoux v. State

In re Hall

In re FD

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details