Earlington DUI-DWI Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Christofer Johnson
About | Practice Areas
Christofer C. Johnson, Esq.
1500 Walnut Street Suite 2000 Philadelphia, PA 19102» view map
Criminal Defense
Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer

Christofer C. Johnson, Esq. has a track record of successful case outcomes and provides legal counsel for a reasonable price.

800-694-1771
1. Christofer Johnson Philadelphia, PA
  Attorney at Law - PA, 2009
  Widener University J.D. 2009
2. AboutChristofer C. Johnson, Esq.
  Proudly serving Philadelphia, PA and the neighboring communities.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Liam John Duffy

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Landlord-Tenant, DUI-DWI, Estate, Wills & Probate

Liam J. Duffy practices in the areas of Divorce, Support, Child Custody, Equitable Distribution, Protection from Abuse, Civil Litigation, Business Law... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-681-2950

190 Bethlehem Pike, Colmar, PA 18915

Steven Fisher Fairlie

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Car Accident, Wrongful Death

Award winning lawyers handling Criminal Defense, Personal Injury, and DUI matters.

Steven F. Fairlie has been designated a Pennsylvania “SuperLawyer” in both Personal Injury and Criminal Defense by Philadelphia Magazine and place... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-893-7191

1501 Lower State Road, Ste 304, North Wales, PA 19454

Aman "Tip" Barber

DUI-DWI, Traffic, Criminal, White Collar Crime

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

418 Main Street, Harleysville, PA 19438

Amanda L. Kurecian

Landlord-Tenant, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy & Debt, Property Damage

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

246 W. Broad Street, Quakertown, PA 18951

Christopher P. Fiore

Traffic, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

418 Main St, Harleysville, PA 19438

Christopher H. Meinzer

Traffic, Family Law, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

516 Main Street, Pennsburg, PA 18073

Gail Marr-Williams

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

328 W. Broad Street, Quakertown, PA 18951

Gavin R. Laboski

Real Estate, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

314 W Broad St, Quakertown, PA 18951

Jack J. Hetherington

Traffic, Estate, Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status: Deceased Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

608 W Main St, Lansdale, PA 19446

Kevin M. McGrath

Lawsuit & Dispute, Estate, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

375 Morris Road, Lansdale, PA 19446

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Com. v. Haag

... In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether two offenses of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol ("DUI") occurring within one and one-half hours of each other should be considered first and second offenses for purposes of sentencing under the recidivist provisions of ...

Glidden v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

... County (trial court) that denied his statutory appeal from a one-year suspension of his operating privileges for a violation of Section 3802(a)(1) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.CS Â§ 3802(a)(1) (driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substance (DUI), general impairment). ...

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

... suspended Licensee's operating privileges because of three criminal convictions arising from a single accident: reckless driving; failing to stop his vehicle at an accident scene where 168 death or personal injury was involved; and driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Earlington DUI-DWI Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

Christofer C. Johnson, Esq.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Liam John Duffy

Steven Fisher Fairlie

Aman "Tip" Barber

Amanda L. Kurecian

Christopher P. Fiore

Christopher H. Meinzer

Gail Marr-Williams

Gavin R. Laboski

Jack J. Hetherington

Kevin M. McGrath

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACTUS REUS

MOTION IN LIMINE

CAPITAL CASE

CIVIL

INTERROGATION

CRIMINAL INSANITY

HUNG JURY

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Com. v. Haag

Glidden v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details