East Carbon DUI-DWI Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory Smith
About | Practice Areas
Greg Smith and Associates
7324 Union Park Ave Suite 101 Midvale, UT 84047Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Proudly Serving The State of Utah

We've successfully resolved thousands of criminal defense and other cases, and we can take your call now!

800-925-8751
1. Gregory Smith Midvale, UT
  Attorney at Law - UT, 1993
  Brigham Young University J.D. 1993
2. AboutGreg Smith and Associates
  Over 25 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for East Carbon DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all East Carbon lawyers.

D. Shane Clifford

Other, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

Huntington, UT 84528

Ron Smith

Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

Fruitland, UT 84027

Allen S Thorpe

General Practice

Status: Deceased Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

Castle Dale, UT 84513

Jon Stearmer

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

Duchesne, UT 84021

Stephen D Foote

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

21554 W 9000 S, Duchesne, UT 84021

Grant H Charles

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

21554 West 900 South, Duchesne, UT 84021

Tyler C Allred

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

734 North Center Street, Duchesne, UT 84021

Michael Kent Goodrich

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

21554 W 9000 S, Duchesne, UT 84021

Clay Warren Crozier

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

657 E Main Street, Duchesne, UT 84021

Duane W Moss

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

Hc 63, Fruitland, UT 84027

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Palmer

... DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice: INTRODUCTION. Â¶ 1 Robert Palmer contends that the court of appeals erred in upholding his third-degree felony conviction under Utah's driving under the influence (DUI) recidivism enhancement statute. ... [2] Id. ("A [DUI] conviction ... ...

State v. Palmer

... McHUGH, Judge: Â¶ 1 Robert Palmer challenges his conviction under subsection (2)(a) of Utah Code section 41-6-44, which makes it unlawful to operate a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or any drug (DUI). ... Accordingly, we affirm Palmer's felony DUI conviction. ...

Orem City v. Longoria

... MEMORANDUM DECISION. BENCH, Judge: Â¶1 Defendant Jaime M. Longoria appeals his convictions for driving under the influence (DUI) and reckless driving, both class B misdemeanors. ... The jury again convicted Defendant of DUI and reckless driving, and he now appeals. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

East Carbon DUI-DWI Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

Greg Smith and Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

D. Shane Clifford

Ron Smith

Allen S Thorpe

Jon Stearmer

Stephen D Foote

Grant H Charles

Tyler C Allred

Michael Kent Goodrich

Clay Warren Crozier

Duane W Moss

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

INTENTIONAL TORT

JURY NULLIFICATION

NOLO CONTENDERE

PROSECUTE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SELF-DEFENSE

ACQUITTAL

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Palmer

State v. Palmer

Orem City v. Longoria

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details