East Falmouth Felony Lawyer, Massachusetts

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Adam Beck
About | Practice Areas
Adam P. Beck, M.D., Esq.
25 Marston St Suite 303 Lawrence, MA 01841» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Legal Expertise You Can Rely On

By working with lawyers who are also doctors, clients can benefit from advocates who have a deeper understanding of their physical injuries, medical needs, and prognoses.

800-383-8491
1. Adam Beck Lawrence, MA
  Attorney at Law- MA, 2010
  Massachusetts School of Law, J.D. 2010
2. AboutAdam P. Beck, M.D., Esq.
  Legal Expertise You Can Rely On
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for East Falmouth Felony lawyer.
Below are all East Falmouth Criminal lawyers.

Matthew J. Schmitt

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

50 Route 28A Cataumet Landing, Cataumet, MA 02534

Genevieve K. Henrique

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

23 Wyndlea Circle, East Falmouth, MA 02536

Robert Wallace Martinez

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

178 Teaticket Highway, East Falmouth, MA 02536

John Glynn

Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

122 Teaticket Highway, East Falmouth, MA 02536

Patrick T. O'Regan

Real Estate, Estate, Criminal, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

69 Ovington Drive, East Falmouth, MA 02536

Noah Anthony Clements

Lawsuit & Dispute, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

East Falmouth, MA 02536

Joseph F. Hodapp

Criminal, Business, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

48 Partridge Lane, East Falmouth, MA 02536

Paula M Kelley, Esquire

Estate Planning, Divorce, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Kelley Law, LLC, Falmouth, MA 02540

Sarah J. Briones

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

24 Prospect Street, Falmouth, MA 02540

Jose A. Vazquez

Immigration, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

2 Quinapoxet Ave, Falmouth, MA 02540

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Gunter

... Paul Gunter was convicted of murder in the first degree on a theory of felony-murder, in violation of GL c. 265, Â§ 1; armed assault in a dwelling with intent to commit a felony, in violation of GL c. 265, Â§ 18A; and illegal possession of a firearm, in violation of GL c. 269, Â§ 10 (a). This ...

Commonwealth v. Womack

... Catherine Langevin Semel, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth. SPINA, J. The defendant was convicted of felony-murder in the first degree. The underlying felony was an armed robbery while masked. The defendant appealed. ...

Commonwealth v. Young

... relief in both cases from a single justice of this court pursuant to GL c. 211, Â§ 3, contending that possessory firearm offenses come within Â§ 58A (1), which permits the Commonwealth to move for pretrial detention if a defendant has been charged with "any other felony that by its ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

East Falmouth Felony Lawyer, Massachusetts

Sponsored Law Firm

Adam P. Beck, M.D., Esq.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Matthew J. Schmitt

Genevieve K. Henrique

Robert Wallace Martinez

John Glynn

Patrick T. O'Regan

Noah Anthony Clements

Joseph F. Hodapp

Paula M Kelley, Esquire

Sarah J. Briones

Jose A. Vazquez

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

EAVESDROPPING

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

ACCOMPLICE

INTERROGATION

JURY

SELF-DEFENSE

ACQUITTAL

INSANITY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Gunter

Commonwealth v. Womack

Commonwealth v. Young

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details