Elio Morgan | New Haven Accident & Injury Lawyer

Elio Morgan is our principal attorney. Born in Hanover Jamaica, attorney Morgan earned his law degree at Quinnipiac University School of Law. He completed his undergraduate studies at the University of the West Indies graduating with a BS (Hons) and went on to complete a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine degree from the University of Veterinary Science in Brno, Czech Republic. He worked in the fields of agriculture and biomedical research before venturing into the field of law.

Elio Morgan is our principal attorney. Born in Hanover Jamaica, attorney Morgan earned his law degree at Quinnipiac University School of Law. He completed his undergraduate studies at the University of the West Indies graduating with a BS (Hons) and went on to complete a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine degree from the University of Veterinary Science in Brno, Czech Republic. He worked in the fields of agriculture and biomedical research before venturing into the field of law.

Position	Organization	Location	Duration
Firm's Founder	Law Offices of Elio C. C. Morgan	Bridgeport, CT	Present

School	Degree	Major	Graduation
University of Veterinary Science in Brno, Czech Republic	PHD	Doctor of Veterinary Medicine degree	n/a
University of the West Indies	B.S.		n/a

State / Court	Date
Connecticut	2004

• Member | Connecticut Bar Association

• Excellence in Oral Advocacy - Quinnipiac University School of Law
  Distinguished Academic Achievement, Criminal Law - Quinnipiac University School of Law

• STATE v SANTOS
  Attorney for the Appellant (Defendant) in an Appeals case in which said Appellant  appealed from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation and reinstating six years of the executed portion of a previous sentence for armed robbery. Five years after his initial conviction, said Appellant was arrested on a sexual assault charge. Although he was found not guilty because of reasonable doubt at trial, his was provoked by using the lesser standard of proof of a preponderance of the evidence. He challenged the court's conclusion that the evidence was sufficient to establish that he committed sexual assault in the first degree. The Appeals court affirmed the original Trial decision.

• SAKSENA V. COMM'R OF CORR.
  Appellant: Attorney for the appellant, Sharad Saksena. Saksens was appealing a judgment handed down from the habeas court which denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant alleges that the court erred when it concluded that the counsel did not render ineffective assistance by failing to advise him about the immigration consequences of his guilty plea. Upon review of the case and the representation that Saksena received, the appeals court found no err in judgment had occurred. The decision of the habeas court was affirmed.

Sun.	Mon.	Tue.	Wed.	Thu.	Fri.	Sat.
	9:00 am - 5:00 pm	9:00 am - 5:00 pm	9:00 am - 5:00 pm	9:00 am - 5:00 pm	9:00 am - 5:00 pm

 Sat: By Appointments Only

• About | Elio Morgan