Elkmont Juvenile Law Lawyer, Alabama

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Shannon Moore
About | Practice Areas
The Moore Firm, LLC
917 B Merchants Walk Huntsville, AL 35801» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Assertive. Dedicated. Thorough.

The Moore Firm, LLC knows how to interpret Alabama law to your best advantage. Our lawyers are passionate about their work and fearlessly strive for the results you require.

800-899-8050
1. Shannon Moore Huntsville, AL
  Attorney at Law - AL, 1998
  University of Alabama J.D. 1998
2. AboutThe Moore Firm, LLC
  We Fight Hard to Prevail in Your Legal Matter
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Edward Lynn Alley

Traffic, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Athens, AL 35612

John Robert Allen

Juvenile Law, Other, State Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

102 Clinton Ave W, Huntsville, AL 35801

Elissa H. Green

Military, Traffic, Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

116 Southside Sq, Huntsville, AL 35801

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

ACCESSORY

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An acces... (more...)

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An accessory is usually not physically present during the crime. For example, hiding a robber who is being sought by the police might make you an 'accessory after the fact' to a robbery. Compare accomplice.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY (D.A.)

A lawyer who is elected to represent a state government in criminal cases in a designated county or judicial district. A D.A.'s duties typically include reviewi... (more...)

A lawyer who is elected to represent a state government in criminal cases in a designated county or judicial district. A D.A.'s duties typically include reviewing police arrest reports, deciding whether to bring criminal charges against arrested people and prosecuting criminal cases in court. The D.A. may also supervise other attorneys, called Deputy District Attorneys or Assistant District Attorneys. In some states a District Attorney may be called a Prosecuting Attorney, County Attorney or State's Attorney. In the federal system, the equivalent to the D.A. is a United States Attorney. The country has many U.S. Attorneys, each appointed by the President, who supervise regional offices staffed with prosecutors called Assistant United States Attorneys.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

WBGM v. PST

... Procedural History. The parties were never married, and, in 2001, the mother filed a child-support action in the Morgan Juvenile Court ("the juvenile court"). On January 29, 2001, the juvenile court exercised its jurisdiction by ...

Ex parte TC

... This mandamus proceeding was initiated by TC ("the father"), who is the primary custodial parent of AC and Tr.C. ("the children"); the father seeks review of, among other things, a "status quo" order entered by the Baldwin Juvenile Court in favor of the children's mother, CE ("the ...

KCG v. SJR

... MOORE, Judge. In January 2008, SJR ("the paternal grandmother") filed a petition seeking to have her grandchild, HAG ("the child"), declared dependent by the Baldwin Juvenile Court ("the juvenile court") and to have the child's legal custody awarded to her. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Elkmont Juvenile Law Lawyer, Alabama

Sponsored Law Firm

The Moore Firm, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Edward Lynn Alley

John Robert Allen

Elissa H. Green

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

CORPUS DELECTI

HUNG JURY

ACCESSORY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

PROSECUTE

DISTRICT ATTORNEY (D.A.)

SENTENCE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

WBGM v. PST

Ex parte TC

KCG v. SJR

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details