Flat Lick Antitrust Lawyer, Kentucky


Includes: International Antitrust, Unfair Competition

J.P. Cline

Civil Rights, Medical Malpractice, Business, Wrongful Death
Status:  In Good Standing           

Shane Allen Romines

Class Action, Family Law, Banking & Finance, Wills & Probate
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  22 Years

R. Aaron Hostettler

Bankruptcy & Debt, Real Estate, Business, Employment, Estate
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  27 Years

Adam L Towe

Insurance, Workers' Compensation
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Flat Lick Antitrust Lawyers and Flat Lick Antitrust Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Business areas including Administrative Law, Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Contract, Corporate, Insurance, Merger & Acquisition and Securities attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Mendell v. Golden-Farley of Hopkinsville, Inc.

573 SW2d 346 (1978). Ira L. MENDELL, Roger S. Smith and Leonard Yaseen, d/b/a Hopkinsville Associates, a partnership, Appellants, v. GOLDEN-FARLEY OF HOPKINSVILLE, INC., Appellee. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. January 6, 1978. ...

Eastern Kentucky Resources v. Arnett

... The Noerr-Pennington doctrine, developed by the United States Supreme Court in antitrust cases, provides that "activities within the normal scope of petitioning which represent attempts to secure anticompetitive governmental responses are exempt from antitrust liability." David ...

Brownsboro Road Restaurant v. Jerrico, Inc.

... Brownsboro answered by denial and counter-claimed for damages, alleging in the counter-claim (1) anticipatory breach and (2) certain federal antitrust violations. ... 1981). Appellant claims that, in any event, his antitrust claim should have been dismissed without prejudice. ...