Forest Hill DUI-DWI Lawyer, Maryland

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Charles Waechter

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Traffic, DUI-DWI, Felony, Internet

Bel Air Criminal Defense Law Firm If you face criminal charges, an experienced and respected defense lawyer can help protect your rights, evaluate ... (more)

CONTACT

800-655-3150

206 North Hickory Avenue, Bel Air, MD 21014

Seth Okin

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor

Seth Okin is a lawyer in the state of Maryland who focuses on criminal cases. He has tried cases in the areas of assault, domestic violence, drug char... (more)

CONTACT

410-782-0742

108 West Timonium Road, Lutherville Timonium, MD 21093

Harry M. Rifkin

✓ VERIFIED

Personal Injury, DUI-DWI, Business, Bankruptcy

A native Baltimorean, Mr. Rifkin has spent his career helping people. He graduated college in three years from the George Washington University with... (more)

CONTACT

800-446-1960

7134 Pheasant Cross Drive, Baltimore, MD 21209

Laura L. Henninger

Traffic, Estate Planning, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

5 South Hickory Avenue, Bel Air, MD 21014

Charles Edward Kearney

Farms, Child Support, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

101 Thomas Street, Lower Level, Bel Air, MD 21014

Francis J. Henninger

Traffic, Estate Planning, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

5 South Hickory Avenue, Bel Air, MD 21014

F. Spencer Gordon

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Grand Jury Proceedings

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

204 Courtland Avenue, Towson, MD 21204

Allan H Rombro

Computer Law, Federal, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

550 Newbury St., Baltimore, MD 21209

Patricia M. Cochran

Family Law, Traffic, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

11 E. Lexington St., Baltimore, MD 21201

Caroline M. Kang

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

11 East Lexington Street, Baltimore, MD 21202

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

BAIL BOND

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear... (more...)

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear for a court hearing, the judge can issue a warrant for his arrest and threaten to 'forfeit,' or keep, the money if the defendant doesn't appear soon. Usually, the bondsman will look for the defendant and bring him back, forcefully if necessary, in order to avoid losing the bail money.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Forest Hill DUI-DWI Lawyer, Maryland

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Charles Waechter

Seth Okin

Harry M. Rifkin

Laura L. Henninger

Charles Edward Kearney

Francis J. Henninger

F. Spencer Gordon

Allan H Rombro

Patricia M. Cochran

Caroline M. Kang

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CORPUS DELECTI

ACCOMPLICE

MENS REA

SPECIFIC INTENT

JURY NULLIFICATION

EAVESDROPPING

IMPEACH

BAIL BOND

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Turner v. State

Attorney Grievance Comm. v. Tanko

Washington v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details