Four Corners Criminal Lawyer, Wyoming

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Hughes
About | Practice Areas
Hughes Law Office
113 North 3rd St Sundance, WY 82729» view map
Divorce & Family, Criminal, Estate
Working Relentlessly For You

Let Hughes Law Office handle your legal matters today!

800-960-0161
1. Mark Hughes Sundance, WY
  Attorney at Law- WY
  University of Wyoming College of Law, J.D. 1978
2. AboutHughes Law Office
  Working Relentlessly For You
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Divorce & Family
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Four Corners Criminal lawyer.
Below are all Four Corners lawyers.

Mark L. Hughes

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Lawsuit & Dispute

Mark Hughes is a practicing lawyer in the state of Wyoming. Attorney Hughes received his J.D. from the University of Wyoming College of Law in 1978.

CONTACT

307-283-1313

113 North 3rd St, Sundance, WY 82729

Joseph Michael Baron

Litigation, Prosecution, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

309 East Cleveland Street, Sundance, WY 82729

Dublin Dan Hughes

Estate Planning, Wills & Probate, Family Law, Contract, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 3 Years

CONTACT

113 North 3rd St, Sundance, WY 82729

Patrick F. Crow

Other, Government, Divorce & Family Law, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 53 Years

CONTACT

305 East Warwick Street, Newcastle, WY 82701

Kent W. Spence

Construction, Aviation, Discrimination, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

15 South Jackson Street, Jackson, WY 83001

William Shaw Patton

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

1648 Gray Blvd, Newcastle, WY 82701

Kimberley A. Knowlton

General Practice

Status: Retired Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

319 East Ryan Street, Sundance, WY 82729

Fred R. Dollison

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

309 Cleveland Street, Sundance, WY 82729

Lynda Rose Black

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

309 Cleveland Street, Sundance, WY 82729

Kara Lorraine Ellsbury

Litigation, Energy, Employee Rights, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

113 North 3Rd Street, Sundance, WY 82729

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

BAILOR

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in or... (more...)

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in order to get it fixed would be a bailor.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

BAIL BOND

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear... (more...)

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear for a court hearing, the judge can issue a warrant for his arrest and threaten to 'forfeit,' or keep, the money if the defendant doesn't appear soon. Usually, the bondsman will look for the defendant and bring him back, forcefully if necessary, in order to avoid losing the bail money.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Swain v. State

... Swain also appeals his conviction for indirect criminal contempt arising from his failure to comply with the district court's order requiring him, as a condition of probation, to attend and complete an inpatient substance abuse treatment program. ... [1]. Criminal Contempt Conviction. ...

Jackson v. State

... our decision in Halbleib v. State, 7 P.3d 45, 49 (Wyo.2000), contends that Mr. Jackson was not entitled to any credit against his original sentence because the incarceration pending probation revocation proceedings was not "directly attributable" to the underlying criminal charge ...

Granzer v. State

... Heywood v. State, 2007 WY 149, Â¶ 26, 170 P.3d 1227, 1234 (Wyo. 2007). [Â¶ 10] Nevertheless, we have also stated that the trial court commits a fundamental error, and reversal is required, when it fails to give an instruction on an essential element of a criminal offense. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Four Corners Criminal Lawyer, Wyoming

Sponsored Law Firm

Hughes Law Office

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Mark L. Hughes

Joseph Michael Baron

Dublin Dan Hughes

Patrick F. Crow

Kent W. Spence

William Shaw Patton

Kimberley A. Knowlton

Fred R. Dollison

Lynda Rose Black

Kara Lorraine Ellsbury

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

BAILOR

MOTION IN LIMINE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ACCOMPLICE

SPECIFIC INTENT

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

BAIL BOND

IMPEACH

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Swain v. State

Jackson v. State

Granzer v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details