Frederic Wieder | Palm Desert Family Lawyer

I represented mother who was having marital difficulties with father. The parties had a two month old child who went to live with the paternal grandparents on a temporary basis in Virginia. When they refused to return the child to mother after she filed for divorce and custody in California where she, father and child had been residing, they filed and obtained a Guardianship in Virginia. After months of hearings in the California and Virginia courts, the Virginia court relinquished child custody jurisdiction to the California court.

I built a successful practice by networking with other attorneys, volunteering as a mediator and judge pro-tem, and print and online advertising.

Clients should evaluate an attorney by seeing who gives straight answers, not necessarily the answers they want to hear; is clear on billing practices; and who explains the law, court proceedings and how he/she plans to resolve the case.

An attorney who is familiar with local attorneys and judges always has the advantage. He/she will know which attorneys are trustworthy and how the judges normally rule on various issues.

In a free phone conversation, I can identify the issues and explain what needs to be done to resolve them.

In a free phone consultation, I need to know the immediate problems, and the client's goals.

I have over 47 years experience as a practicing attorney. I am a State Bar Certified Family Law Specialist. I have many years experience as a temporary judge, a mediator and arbitrator.

Helping people obtain a fair resolution of their case.

Travel; Cooking; Reading.

I volunteer my services to the courts.

• State Bar of California
  California Family Law Specialists; Desert Bar Association
  

• Family Law | Not a denial of equal protection | 124 Cal App 3rd 524. Opposing party challenged the conclusive presumption of paternity of the parties who were married and cohabitating when their child was conceived. During the trial court proceeding, the statute was amended allowing a parent to challenge paternity during the first two years of the child's life. The child was over two years old at the time of the trial and the father's attorney challenged the Constitutionality of the trial court's refusal to challange paternity claiming it was a denial of equal protection. The Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's ruling.

Frederic Steven Wieder has been a Premium Member since April 28, 2016.
Lawyers with longer memberships tend to have more experience so we use the Membership date to help prioritize lawyer listings on search pages.

Above credentials have been verified independently by Lawyer.com.

As a service to our visitors and members, Lawyer.com displays the credentials for Premium Lawyer Profiles which Lawyer.com has independently verified. These are displayed at the at the 'Verified Credentials' table. Lawyer.com independently verifies these credentials when a lawyer signs up for a Premium Lawyer Profile. Each Premium Profile lawyer also certifies that they are licensed to practice as an attorney in their state, that they are in good standing with their applicable bar, and that they will notify Lawyer.com if this changes while they have an active profile.

• LinkedIn
• For More Information About Frederic Wieder