Gill Criminal Lawyer, Colorado, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Dion J. Custis
About | Practice Areas
Dion J. Custis, PC
155 E Boardwalk Ste 400 Fort Collins, CO 80525» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Skilled Counsel. Fearless Advocacy.

Our firm has a depth of experience that is hard to find anywhere else. Our lead attorney has fought passionately for the rights of his clients. You deserve a future.

800-979-2711
1. Dion J. Custis Fort Collins, CO
  Attorney at Law - CO, 1993
  University of Wyoming J.D. 1993
2. AboutDion J. Custis, PC
  Through Life's Difficult Moments We'll Stand in Your Corner
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

James Chiu

Immigration, Employment, Sexual Harassment, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1233 8th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631

Shana Velez

Criminal, Indians & Native Populations, Juvenile Law

Status: Inactive Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

812 8Th St, Greeley, CO 80631

Jacob Robert Lofgren

Military & Veterans Appeals, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

812 Eighth Street Plaza, Greeley, CO 80631

Sean Lacefield

Military & Veterans Appeals, Family Law, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

822 7th St, Greeley, CO 80631

Robert Stuart McCormick

Criminal, Natural Resources, Immigration, Business & Trade

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

710 11th Ave, Greeley, CO 80631

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Thomas

... II. Untimeliness of Appeal. CAR 4(b) governs criminal appeals and requires that an appeal must be filed within forty-five days of entry of the judgment or order being appealed. ... P. 35. The rules of criminal procedure do not authorize a motion to reconsider postconviction orders. ...

People v. Martinez

... Once inside, the officer observed neither evidence of drug activity nor other criminal activity by any person inside the house, including the defendant. ... The stop was not based on a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and therefore constituted an unconstitutional seizure. ...

People v. Thompson

... We hold that the Colorado Criminal Justice Records Act ("the 1144 CCJRA"), sections 24-72-301 to -309, CRS (2007), requires the indictment to be released for public inspection in its entirety, subject only to the deletion of identifying information of any alleged sexual assault ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Gill Criminal Lawyer, Colorado, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Dion J. Custis, PC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

James Chiu

Shana Velez

Jacob Robert Lofgren

Sean Lacefield

Robert Stuart McCormick

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

FEDERAL COURT

CRIMINAL INSANITY

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

INTERROGATION

IMPEACH

CONVICTION

INSANITY

CHARGE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Thomas

People v. Martinez

People v. Thompson

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details