Gladstone DUI-DWI Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory Oliveros
About | Practice Areas
Oliveros Law Group, P.C.
9200 S.E. Sunnybrook Boulevard Suite 335 Clackamas, OR 97015» view map
Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
007 Law

At Oliveros Law Group P.C, our attorneys help clients understand their rights when they have been injured due to the deliberate or careless act of another person.

800-797-7891
1. Gregory Oliveros Clackamas, OR
  Attorney at Law - OR, 1990
  Lewis & Clark Law School J.D. 1990
2. AboutOliveros Law Group, P.C.
  007 Law
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert L. Sepp

Employment, Labor Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2350 Willamette Falls Drive, West Linn, OR 97068

Mark R. Bailey

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

294 Warner Milne Road, Oregon City, OR 97045

Bruce Tarbox

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

707 Main Street, Oregon City, OR 97045

Patrick M Birmingham

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

696 Mcvey Ave, Lake Oswego, OR 97034

Rhett L. Bernstein

Estate Planning, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Identity Theft

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

219 7Th St., West Linn, OR 97068

Rhett Bernstein

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

219 7Th St., West Linn, OR 97068

Christine Samwick

DUI-DWI

Status: Inactive Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

460 5Th St, Lake Oswego, OR 97034

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

CONSTABLE

A peace officer for a particular geographic area -- most often a rural county -- who commonly has the power to serve legal papers, arrest lawbreakers and keep t... (more...)

A peace officer for a particular geographic area -- most often a rural county -- who commonly has the power to serve legal papers, arrest lawbreakers and keep the peace. Depending on the state, a constable may be similar to a marshal or sheriff.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kruse

184 P.3d 1182 (2008). 220 Or. App. 38. STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jay Lynn KRUSE, Defendant-Appellant. D055973M, D060612T, A132038 (Control), A132039. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted January 4, 2008. Decided May 14, 2008. ...

State v. Machuca

227 P.3d 729 (2010). 347 Or. 644. STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review, v. Thomas Gregory MACHUCA, Respondent on Review. (CC 050647097; CA A133362; SC S057910). Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc. Argued and Submitted December 16, 2009. ...

Prior v. Department of Revenue

... [2]. In her Complaint, Plaintiff asserts that the Department is in error in withholding the tax refund to pay for her "husband's DUI[,] [because] I have be[en] separated from him for 6 y[ea]rs and have nothing to do with his affairs or finances." [3] (Ptf's Compl at 1, Sec. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Gladstone DUI-DWI Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

Oliveros Law Group, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert L. Sepp

Mark R. Bailey

Bruce Tarbox

Patrick M Birmingham

Rhett L. Bernstein

Rhett Bernstein

Christine Samwick

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CAPITAL CASE

CONSTABLE

SELF-DEFENSE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

SPECIFIC INTENT

INTERROGATION

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kruse

State v. Machuca

Prior v. Department of Revenue

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details