Glencoe DUI-DWI Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Sean Logue
Google+ | Contact Us
Sean Logue & Associates
200 First Avenue 3rd Floor #301A Pittsburgh, PA 15222 » view map
DUI, Sex Crimes, Drug Crimes, Expungements
Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day

Our lawyers bring a thorough understanding of criminal issues to help minimize the damage that a DUI charge can bring to our clients.

412-389-0805
1. Sean Logue Pittsburgh, PA
  Attorney At Law - Pennsylvania, 2008
  West Virginia, J.D. - 2007
2. Google+
  Visit us and follow on Google+ to interact on social media.
3. Contact UsEmail or Call 24/7
  Free initial consultation. Contact us today.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Glencoe DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Glencoe Criminal lawyers.

Michael Justin Shaheen

Real Estate, Estate, Criminal, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

128 S Marietta St, Saint Clairsville, OH 43950

Eric Nelson Costine

Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

136 W Main St, Saint Clairsville, OH 43950

Christopher Michael Berhalter

Real Estate, Family Law, Criminal, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

52160 National Rd, Saint Clairsville, OH 43950

Nicole Renee White

Social Security, Workers' Compensation, Criminal, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

126 E Main St, Saint Clairsville, OH 43950

Thomas Matthew Ryncarz

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Real Estate, Landlord-Tenant

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

3713 Central Avenue, Shadyside, OH 43947

James Lee Nichelson

Real Estate, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

Martins Ferry, OH 43935

Rupert Nelms Beetham

Real Estate, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Estate

Status: Inactive Licensed: 53 Years

CONTACT

Cadiz, OH 43907

Geoffrey Bird Mosser

Juvenile Law, Real Estate, Estate, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 54 Years

CONTACT

232 S Main St, Cadiz, OH 43907

Matthew Paul Puskarich

Government, Environmental Law Other, Criminal, Religious Discrimination

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

100 W Market St, Cadiz, OH 43907

Audrey Jenna Hokes

Juvenile Law, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

105 Jamison Ave, Cadiz, OH 43907

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Hoover

... consider the constitutionality of RC 4511.19(A)(2), which requires the imposition of criminal penalties upon certain persons who refuse to consent to chemical testing after being arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or a drug of abuse ("DUI"). ...

State v. Bragwell

... {Â¶2} On May 25, 2006, a Mahoning County grand jury indicted appellant on one count of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), a third-degree felony in violation of RC ... Appellant entered pleas of not guilty to the charge and specifications. This was appellant's thirteenth DUI. ...

State v. DETSKAS

... This question is relevant because Detskas was previously convicted in Michigan, under that state's law, for the offense of driving while impaired (DWI) (a lesser included offense of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Glencoe DUI-DWI Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

Sean Logue & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Michael Justin Shaheen

Eric Nelson Costine

Christopher Michael Berhalter

Nicole Renee White

Thomas Matthew Ryncarz

James Lee Nichelson

Rupert Nelms Beetham

Geoffrey Bird Mosser

Matthew Paul Puskarich

Audrey Jenna Hokes

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SPECIFIC INTENT

INTERROGATION

HABEAS CORPUS

BURDEN OF PROOF

VENIREMEN

IMPEACH

PROSECUTE

ACTUS REUS

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Hoover

State v. Bragwell

State v. DETSKAS

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details