Harrison County, TX Criminal Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Robert Jones
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Robert R. Jones III
2411 Emancipation Ave, Suite 202, Houston, TX 77004Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Expert Representation for Reasonable Rates

If you need representation, call me 24/7.

800-883-8760
1. Robert Jones San Antonio, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 2014
  South Texas College of Law J.D. 2011
2. AboutLaw Office of Robert R. Jones III
  Call me 24/7--Reasonable Rates
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Vernard Solomon

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 55 Years

CONTACT

103 E. Houston, Marshall, TX 75670

Al T. Davis

Criminal, Administrative Law, Government

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

646 Fernbrook Ln, Marshall, TX 75672

Richard L. Berry

Juvenile Law, Other, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

111 W Austin St, Marshall, TX 75670

David B. Fugler

Litigation, Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

9182 Rosborough Springs Rd, Marshall, TX 75672

Kenneth Wayne Hill

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

3495 Cooks Rd, Marshall, TX 75670

Laura Michelle Carpenter

Wills, Estate, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

106 W Houston St, Marshall, TX 75670

Kevin Mccarter

Criminal

Status: Deceased Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

306 W. Houston, Marshall, TX 75670

George Valton Jones

Family Law, Personal Injury, Criminal, Litigation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

109 W Austin St, Marshall, TX 75670

Craig A. Fletcher

Juvenile Law, State Appellate Practice, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

203 W Austin St, Marshall, TX 75670

Christina Culwell Wedding

Family Law, Juvenile Law, Wills, Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

103 E Houston St, Marshall, TX 75670

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

... III. Is Clewis Necessary to Address Some Widespread Criminal Justice Problem That Jackson v. Virginia Is Inadequate To Address. We agree ... review. II. A. Logic Requires a Single Standard of Sufficiency Review in Criminal Cases. I ...

In re Schulman

In re David SCHULMAN. No. AP-75,911. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. April 30, 2008. 404 John G. Jasuta, Austin, for Appellant. ... We filed and set this matter for consideration. II. A criminal defense attorney's duty is to zealously represent the interests of his client on appeal. ...

Laster v. State

... No. PD-1276-07. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. January 14, 2009. 515 Kim Campbell, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Kimberly Colliet Wesley, Assistant Criminal District Atty., Fort Worth, Jeffrey L. Van Horn, State's Atty., Austin, for State. OPINION. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Harrison County, TX Criminal Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Robert R. Jones III

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Vernard Solomon

Al T. Davis

Richard L. Berry

David B. Fugler

Kenneth Wayne Hill

Laura Michelle Carpenter

Kevin Mccarter

George Valton Jones

Craig A. Fletcher

Christina Culwell Wedding

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA BARGAIN

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SELF-INCRIMINATION

JURY NULLIFICATION

IMPRISON

CONVICTION

PROSECUTE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

In re Schulman

Laster v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 70

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details