Harvard Juvenile Law Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Terry Slaw
About | Practice Areas
Alan H. Shifrin & Associates, LLC
3315 Algonquin Road, Suite 202, Rolling Meadows, IL 60008Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Over 35 Years of Experience

Terry Slaw is an experienced criminal defense lawyer who will be there for you every step of the way.

800-996-4250
1. Terry Slaw Rolling Meadows, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 1982
2. AboutAlan H. Shifrin & Associates, LLC
  Over 35 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Brian J. Mirandola

Juvenile Law, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

47 DuPage Court, Elgin, IL 60120

Robin Lorain Berry

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

8900 Us Highway 14, Crystal Lake, IL 60012

Robin Berry

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

8900 Us Highway 14, Crystal Lake, IL 60012

John S. Carlson

Antitrust, Juvenile Law, Intellectual Property, Franchising

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

3005 Jenny Jae Ln, Crystal Lake, IL 60012

Steve Carlson

International Intellectual Property, Antitrust, Juvenile Law, Business & Trade

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

3005 Jenny Jae Ln, Crystal Lake, IL 60012

Brendan William Caver

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Juvenile Law, Felony

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

308 West State Street, Rockford, IL 61101

David Richard Castegnaro

Criminal, Family Law, Traffic, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

1004 No. Main St, Rockford, IL 61103

Francis M Martinez

Traffic, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

308 W State St, Rockford, IL 61101

Janet Buttron

Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

8525 Flagg Rd, Chana, IL 61015

Janet Buttron

Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

8525 Flagg Rd, Chana, IL 61015

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People ex rel. Birkett v. Konetski

... In declining to require registration, the respondent noted the minor was not afforded the right to a jury trial in this juvenile delinquency proceeding. ... The respondent further stated it is not appropriate to require registration without providing a juvenile the right to a jury trial. ...

In re Lakisha M.

... After a trial (705 ILCS 405/5-601 (West 2004)), a juvenile court found Lakisha guilty of committing the offense of aggravated battery, a Class 3 felony (720 ILCS 5/12-4(b)(3), (e) (West 2004)), [1] and adjudicated her delinquent. ...

People v. Coleman

... Defendant appeals, arguing (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for eliciting testimony from defendant regarding his prior juvenile conviction, and (2) the sentence for armed violence predicated on robbery as compared to the sentence for armed robbery with a firearm violates ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Harvard Juvenile Law Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

Alan H. Shifrin & Associates, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Brian J. Mirandola

Robin Lorain Berry

Robin Berry

John S. Carlson

Steve Carlson

Brendan William Caver

David Richard Castegnaro

Francis M Martinez

Janet Buttron

Janet Buttron

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BURGLARY

GRAND JURY

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

MCNAGHTEN RULE

INTENTIONAL TORT

ACCOMPLICE

BURDEN OF PROOF

ASSAULT

HABEAS CORPUS

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People ex rel. Birkett v. Konetski

In re Lakisha M.

People v. Coleman

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details