Hortense Felony Lawyer, Georgia

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Ronald Baker
About | Practice Areas
Ronald Baker Attorney at Law
11877 Douglas Rd Suite 102191 Johns Creek, GA 30005» view map
Intellectual Property Law
Working Relentlessly For You

Ronald Baker is a practicing lawyer in Georgia who handles cases involving Intellectual Property Law.

800-597-8640
1. Ronald Baker Johns Creek, GA
  Attorney at Law- GA
  Walter F. George School of Law, J.D.
2. AboutRonald Baker Attorney at Law
  Working Relentlessly For You
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Intellectual Property Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Hortense Felony lawyer.
Below are all Hortense Criminal lawyers.

Kimberly Laverne Copeland

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Immigration, Accident & Injury, Estate

Kimberly L. Copeland, founder of Kimberly L. Copeland & Associates in Jesup, Georgia, has become one of the most respected criminal lawyers in Georgi... (more)

CONTACT

800-643-8160

256 N. Brunswick Street, Jesup, GA 31598

Jason Randall Clark

Traffic, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2225 Gloucester Street, Brunswick, GA 31520

Samuel Andrew Lochridge

Felony

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

1131 Chapel Crossing Road, Brunswick, GA 31524

Helen H. Aberle

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

612 Harper Street, Jesup, GA 31546

Tracy Alan Brown

Real Estate, Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

148 North Wayne Street, Jesup, GA 31546

J. Alvin Leaphart

Dispute Resolution, Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 63 Years

CONTACT

155 N. Brunswick Street, Jesup, GA 31546

Brian Christopher Tyrone

Wills, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

241 E Walnut St, Jesup, GA 31546

Brian Christopher Tyrone

Wills, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

241 E Walnut St, Jesup, GA 31546

Joseph Latimer Phelps

Lawsuit & Dispute, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

356 E. Cherry Street, Jesup, GA 31546

Jonathan Pratt Lockwood

Other, Lawsuit & Dispute, Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

241 East Walnut Street, Jesup, GA 31546

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

PROSECUTOR

A lawyer who works for the local, state or federal government to bring and litigate criminal cases.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Quiroz v. State

... [15]. 4. Because the question is likely to recur on retrial, we address Quiroz's contention that the trial court erred when it denied his motion in limine concerning his felony conviction three years earlier for possession of cocaine. ...

Walker v. Hale

... Daniel Hale was indicted on charges of malice murder, two counts of felony murder based on the underlying felonies of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. ...

Lucky v. State

... Atty. Gen., for appellee. BENHAM, Justice. Appellant Rico Antonio Lucky was convicted of and sentenced for felony murder with armed robbery as the underlying felony, assault with a deadly weapon, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Hortense Felony Lawyer, Georgia

Sponsored Law Firm

Ronald Baker Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Kimberly Laverne Copeland

Jason Randall Clark

Samuel Andrew Lochridge

Helen H. Aberle

Tracy Alan Brown

J. Alvin Leaphart

Brian Christopher Tyrone

Brian Christopher Tyrone

Joseph Latimer Phelps

Jonathan Pratt Lockwood

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

PROSECUTOR

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

PLEA

CAPITAL CASE

DIRECTED VERDICT

JURY NULLIFICATION

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

BAIL

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Quiroz v. State

Walker v. Hale

Lucky v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details