Hudson Eminent Domain Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard Morris
About | Practice Areas
Morris Law Group PA
7380 France Ave S. Suite 250 Edina, MN 55435» view map
Real Estate Law
We Are Experts In What We Do

Whether it’s your home or business, you are important to us. Reach out today to set up a meeting with one of our experienced Edina lawyers.

800-872-9610
1. Richard Morris Edina, MN
  Attorney at Law- MN, 1974
  William Mitchell College of Law, J.D.
2. AboutMorris Law Group PA
  We Are Experts In What We Do
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Hudson Eminent Domain lawyer.
Below are all Hudson Real Estate lawyers.

R. Michael Waterman

Construction, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

110 Second Street, Hudson, WI 54016

Joel D. Schlitz

Criminal, Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

110 Second Street, Hudson, WI 54016

Hugh H. Gwin

Real Estate, Estate Planning

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

706 19Th St S, Hudson, WI 54016

Jeffrey A. Redmon

Business, Commercial Real Estate, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

401 Second Street, Hudson, WI 54016

Maxfield E. (Max) Neuhaus

Estate, Real Estate, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

219 N Main St, River Falls, WI 54022

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SEVERABILITY CLAUSE

A provision in a contract that preserves the rest of the contract if a portion of it is invalidated by a court. Without a severability clause, a decision by the... (more...)

A provision in a contract that preserves the rest of the contract if a portion of it is invalidated by a court. Without a severability clause, a decision by the court finding one part of the contract unenforceable would invalidate the entire document.

FAILURE OF CONSIDERATION

The refusal or inability of a contracting party to perform its side of a bargain.

CONDITIONS OF CARRIAGE

The terms of your contract with an airline after you buy a ticket. Conditions of carriage cover everything from baggage limitations to the amount of compensatio... (more...)

The terms of your contract with an airline after you buy a ticket. Conditions of carriage cover everything from baggage limitations to the amount of compensation you can recover if you're injured on the flight. These provisions often vary from airline to airline. A few, but by no means most, conditions of carriage appear in the fine print on the back of your ticket. To find out about the rest, you can ask the airline for a copy; it is legally obligated to provide one. The conditions of carriage contain a lot of fine print detail and will not make for exciting reading.

SECURITY DEPOSIT

A payment required by a landlord to ensure that a tenant pays rent on time and keeps the rental unit in good condition. If the tenant damages the property or le... (more...)

A payment required by a landlord to ensure that a tenant pays rent on time and keeps the rental unit in good condition. If the tenant damages the property or leaves owing rent, the landlord can use the security deposit to cover what the tenant owes.

DIRECT EXAMINATION

At trial, the initial questioning of a party or witness by the side that called him or her to testify. The major purpose of direct examination is to explain you... (more...)

At trial, the initial questioning of a party or witness by the side that called him or her to testify. The major purpose of direct examination is to explain your version of events to the judge or jury and to undercut your adversary's version. Good direct examination seeks to prove all facts necessary to satisfy the plaintiff's legal claims or causes of action -- for example, that the defendant breached a valid contract and, as a result, the plaintiff suffered a loss.

QUASI-COMMUNITY PROPERTY

A form of property owned by a married couple. If a couple moves to a community property state from a non-community property state, property they acquired togeth... (more...)

A form of property owned by a married couple. If a couple moves to a community property state from a non-community property state, property they acquired together in the non-community property state may be considered quasi-community property. Quasi-community property is treated just like community property when one spouse dies or if the couple divorces.

REAL PROPERTY

Another term for real estate. It includes land and things permanently attached to the land, such as trees, buildings, and stationary mobile homes. Anything that... (more...)

Another term for real estate. It includes land and things permanently attached to the land, such as trees, buildings, and stationary mobile homes. Anything that is not real property is termed personal property.

FORFEITURE

The loss of property or a privilege due to breaking a law. For example, a landlord may forfeit his or her property to the federal or state government if the lan... (more...)

The loss of property or a privilege due to breaking a law. For example, a landlord may forfeit his or her property to the federal or state government if the landlord knows it is a drug-dealing site but fails to stop the illegal activity. Or, you may have to forfeit your driver's license if you commit too many moving violations or are convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

BREACH OF CONTRACT

A legal claim that one party failed to perform as required under a valid agreement with the other party. For example you might say, 'The roofer breached our con... (more...)

A legal claim that one party failed to perform as required under a valid agreement with the other party. For example you might say, 'The roofer breached our contract by using substandard supplies when he repaired my roof.'

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Andrews v. Wisconsin Public Service Corp.

... 7 Wisconsin courts have long recognized that the right to eminent domain cannot be abrogated by contract. City of Milwaukee v. Schomberg, 261 Wis. ... (citing 1 NICHOLS ON EMINENT DOMAIN 75-76, Â§ 22 (2d ed.1917)). Â¶ 9 The rule described in Schomberg remains the law. ...

Buckett v. Jante

... 5 In 2005, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation sought to condemn and purchase the parcel through an eminent domain proceeding for another road construction project. Initially, the DOT looked at Racine county's records and thought Buckett owned the property. ...

City of Milwaukee v. Redevelopment Auth.

... We begin our analysis with a brief review of the history of the unit rule. Â¶ 9 The unit rule "requires that real estate be valued in respect to its gross value as a single entity as if there was only one owner." 4-13 NICHOLS, EMINENT DOMAIN Â§ 13.01[16] Â§ 13-28. ...

Hudson Eminent Domain Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

Morris Law Group PA

SPONSORED LAWYERS

R. Michael Waterman

Joel D. Schlitz

Hugh H. Gwin

Jeffrey A. Redmon

Maxfield E. (Max) Neuhaus

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SEVERABILITY CLAUSE

FAILURE OF CONSIDERATION

CONDITIONS OF CARRIAGE

SECURITY DEPOSIT

DIRECT EXAMINATION

QUASI-COMMUNITY PROPERTY

REAL PROPERTY

FORFEITURE

BREACH OF CONTRACT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Andrews v. Wisconsin Public Service Corp.

Buckett v. Jante

City of Milwaukee v. Redevelopment Auth.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details