Litchfield Park DUI-DWI Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

John Schill
About | Practice Areas
The Schill Law Group
8700 E VÃa de Ventura #210, Scottsdale, AZ 85258Â» view map
Criminal Defense, DUI-DWI
Criminal Lawyer

Have you been arrested for a crime? Criminal charges can have a negative effect on your reputation and future before you are convicted. Contact The Schill Law Group

480-525-8900
1. John Schill Phoenix, AZ
  Attorney at Law - Arizona, 1991
  Creighton University School of Law
2. AboutJohn Schill
  Mr. Schill is a client focused attorney with 25 years of criminal law experience.
3. Practice AreasServices
  Do not hesitate to hire a criminal attorney to fight your charges.
1. Contact
2. E-mail
3. Refer
4. Reviews
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Brian D. Sloan

✓ VERIFIED

DUI-DWI

Attorney Brian Sloan is one of only a handful of Attorneys in Arizona that focuses SOLELY on & Specializes in DUI Defense Representation. Mr. Sloan... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-892-4330

2 N Central Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85004

Joshua Angel Lopez

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Accident & Injury

Joshua A. Lopez, Esq. is an attorney serving Arizona, California, and Nevada. Joshua practices criminal defense and personal injury. Joshua is dedicat... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

702-689-0249

2601 N 3rd St., Phoenix, AZ 85004

Kristen M Curry

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime, Felony, Misdemeanor

State Bar of Arizona Certified Criminal Law Specialist

Kristen Curry has been certified as a Criminal Law Specialist through the State Bar of Arizona for the past 18 years and has extensive jury trial and ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-785-5451

814 W Roosevelt St, Phoenix, AZ 85007

Solomon O. Kanu

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Immigration, Business, DUI-DWI, Traffic

When you are looking for a lawyer to help you resolve a legal matter, you want to know that your attorney has what it takes to handle your case with e... (more)

CONTACT

800-597-8120

111 W Monroe St, Phoenix, AZ 85003

Adam Feldman

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1 E. Washington St., Phoenix, AZ 85004

Jaime P. Garcia

Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Freedom of Information

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1302 W Camelback Rd, Phoenix, AZ 85013

John P. Tatz

Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

20403 N. Lake Pleasant Rd., Peoria, AZ 85382

Jose Luis Mendoza

Juvenile Law, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

3030 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85012

Justin Beresky

Antitrust, Constitutional Law, DUI-DWI, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1421 E. Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ 85014

Kevin Crowley

Employment Discrimination, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Securities Fraud

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

111 W. Monroe St., Phoenix, AZ 85003

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Noceo

... 1 In the summer of 2007, appellee Edward Noceo and petitioner Michael Harris were separately arrested and charged with driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI). ... 4 After being arrested for DUI in August 2007, Noceo consented to a blood draw at the scene. ...

State v. Miller

... The state asserts the RAJI instruction misstates the law by adding an element to the crime of driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI). ... 285, Â¶ 2, 34 P.3d 394, 395 (App.2001) (granting special action jurisdiction to address state's objection to jury instructions in DUI case). ...

Potter v. Vanderpool

... Justice Court. Petitioner Carol Ann Potter was cited for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI), driving with an alcohol concentration (AC) of .08 or more, 1259 and driving with an AC of .15 or more (extreme DUI). Potter's ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Litchfield Park DUI-DWI Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

The Schill Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Brian D. Sloan

Joshua Angel Lopez

Kristen M Curry

Solomon O. Kanu

Adam Feldman

Jaime P. Garcia

John P. Tatz

Jose Luis Mendoza

Justin Beresky

Kevin Crowley

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

MOTION IN LIMINE

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

BURDEN OF PROOF

LARCENY

CORPUS DELECTI

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Noceo

State v. Miller

Potter v. Vanderpool

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details