Littcarr DUI-DWI Lawyer, Kentucky

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Littcarr DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Littcarr Criminal lawyers.

Earnest Seth Combs

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, DUI-DWI, Car Accident, Slip & Fall Accident

A technology enthusiast with the heart & mind of a criminal defense lawyer - an antihero in every sense of the word. In the spirit of going "agains... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

606-785-2783

792 Highway 160 South, Hindman, KY 41822

Terry Dean Jacobs

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Hindman, KY 41822

Dinah Lynn Bowling

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

15 E Main St, Hindman, KY 41822

James A Hubbard

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Isom, KY 41824

Travis O'Neal Terry

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

7806 Hwy 550 E, Garner, KY 41817

William Lewis Collins

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

Whitesburg, KY 41858

William Lewis Collins

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Whitesburg, KY 41858

Charlotte Darl Johnson

Bankruptcy, Medical Malpractice, Elder Law, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

257 Combs Rd, Hazard, KY 41701

Michael Edward Roper

Civil Rights, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Hazard, KY 41702

Cordell Hull Williams

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Hazard, KY 41702

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

BATTERY

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how... (more...)

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how severe the injury. A fist fight is a common battery; being hit by a wild pitch in a baseball game is not.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Com. v. Beard

... On August 17, 2006, the Calloway Circuit Court vacated Dustin Beard's plea of guilty to driving under the influence, second offense (hereinafter DUI 2nd), entered in the Calloway District Court. ... The circuit court agreed and vacated Beard's DUI 2nd conviction. ...

Greene v. Com.

... On June 30, 2005, a Hardin County grand jury returned an indictment charging Robert E. Greene with one count each of operating a motor vehicle with an alcohol concentration of or above 0.08(DUI), fourth offense (KRS 189A:010); and operating a motor vehicle while his ...

Com. v. House

... Opinion of the Court by Justice ABRAMSON. The Commonwealth seeks discretionary review of a Court of Appeals' opinion reversing an agreed order of conviction entered following Lennie House's conditional guilty plea to a charge of driving under the influence (DUI). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Littcarr DUI-DWI Lawyer, Kentucky

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Earnest Seth Combs

Terry Dean Jacobs

Dinah Lynn Bowling

James A Hubbard

Travis O'Neal Terry

William Lewis Collins

William Lewis Collins

Charlotte Darl Johnson

Michael Edward Roper

Cordell Hull Williams

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

IMPEACH

NOLO CONTENDERE

BATTERY

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

BURDEN OF PROOF

PROBABLE CAUSE

EAVESDROPPING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Com. v. Beard

Greene v. Com.

Com. v. House

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details