Mecklenburg County, VA DUI-DWI Lawyers, page 2

JS Bin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Michael Tillotson
About | Practice Areas
Tillotson & Martin, LLP
DWI/DUI Defense throughout the Entire Commonwealth of Virginia Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Virginiaâ€™s Premier DWI/DUI Defense Firm

Michael C. Tillotson is the one to choose when it comes to DWI/DUI defense in Virginia.

800-878-1431
1. Michael Tillotson Newport News, VA
  Attorney at Law - VA, 1992
  William & Mary Law School J.D. 1990
2. AboutTillotson & Martin, LLP
  DWI/DUI Defense throughout the Entire Commonwealth of Virginia
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Mecklenburg DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Mecklenburg lawyers.

Walter Randolph Beales

Real Estate, Motor Vehicle, Estate, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Boydton, VA 23917

Suzanne Palmer Inge

Traffic, Divorce, Adoption, Criminal, Child Custody

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

288 Madison Street, Boydton, VA 23917

Sharon S. Acree

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

24738 Highway 49, Chase City, VA 23924

Mark Mokris

Traffic, Family Law, Criminal, Household Mold

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

413 East Atlantic Street, South Hill, VA 23970

Joshua Brooks Hatchell

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

233 North Main Street, Chase City, VA 23924

Richard Allen Nash

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

393 Washington St, Boydton, VA 23917

Thomson Lipscomb

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Boydton, VA 23917

Richard Allen Nash

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

393 Washington St, Boydton, VA 23917

Richard Allen Nash

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

393 Washington St, Boydton, VA 23917

E. Warren Matthews

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

115 West Danville Street, Bracey, VA 23919

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MISDEMEANOR

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk d... (more...)

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk driving and leaving the scene of an accident are all common misdemeanors.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Mwangi v. Com.

... The court found him guilty of driving under the influence (DUI), in violation of Code Â§ 18.2-266. ... Another of those exhibits, Exhibit 3, is a summons that purports to show that Mwangi had been convicted of DUI in the Alexandria General District Court. ...

Woody v. Com.

... County as a party. However, this case involved two simultaneous prosecutions â€” one on behalf of the Commonwealth (the refusal charge) and one on behalf of the County (the DUI charge). While the Commonwealth's Attorney ...

Grant v. Com.

682 SE2d 84 (2009). 54 Va. App. 714. Phillip Lawton GRANT v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 0877-08-4. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. September 1, 2009. 85 Patrick M. Blanch, Assistant Public Defender ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Mecklenburg County, VA DUI-DWI Lawyers, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Tillotson & Martin, LLP

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Walter Randolph Beales

Suzanne Palmer Inge

Sharon S. Acree

Mark Mokris

Joshua Brooks Hatchell

Richard Allen Nash

Thomson Lipscomb

Richard Allen Nash

Richard Allen Nash

E. Warren Matthews

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MISDEMEANOR

INTERROGATION

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

CAPITAL CASE

BURDEN OF PROOF

MCNAGHTEN RULE

HUNG JURY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Mwangi v. Com.

Woody v. Com.

Grant v. Com.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 70

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details