Metlakatla Criminal Lawyer, Alaska

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Daniel Allan
About | Practice Areas
Dan Allan & Associates
800 E Dimond Blvd Suite 3-620 Anchorage, AK 99515» view map
Criminal Defense
More Than Just A Law Firm

At the Law Offices of Dan Allan and Associates, we believe in helping our clients get rid of some the stress their facing.

907-344-8851
1. Daniel Allan Anchorage, AK
  Attorney at Law- AK
  University of Tulsa College of Law, J.D. 1967
2. AboutDan Allan & Associates
  More Than Just A Law Firm
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Loren K. Stanton

Criminal, Personal Injury, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Ketchikan, AK 99901

Jay A. Hochberg

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

415 Main Street, Ketchikan, AK 99901

Jay Adam Hochberg

Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

415 Main Street, Ketchikan, AK 99901

Jay Hochberg

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

415 Main Street, Ketchikan, AK 99901

Daniel Ethan Doty

Lawsuit & Dispute, International, Environmental Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

415 Main Street, Ketchikan, AK 99901

Henry Clay Keene

Mediation, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

540 Water St, Ketchikan, AK 99901

David W. Rosendin

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: Deceased Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

1289 Tongass Ave, Ketchikan, AK 99901

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Doe v. State

... Moreover, the state asserts that there is no evidence that Alaskans have directed any wrath at convicted sex offenders and notes that the sex offender registry website warns viewers about using registry information to commit a criminal act. ... 5. Application only to criminal behavior. ...

Phillips v. State

... impersonation. [4] In this appeal, Phillips argues that 1150 the trial court should have entered acquittals on his charges of criminal impersonation. We ... Phillips now appeals. Sufficiency of the Evidence of Criminal Impersonation. Phillips argues ...

State v. Galbraith

... Why the State may not challenge Judge Downes. This appeal was originally filed as an expedited appeal under Appellate Rule 216. Peremptory challenge appeals are included in this rule, but only when they are filed by a criminal defendant. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Metlakatla Criminal Lawyer, Alaska

Sponsored Law Firm

Dan Allan & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Loren K. Stanton

Jay A. Hochberg

Jay Adam Hochberg

Jay Hochberg

Daniel Ethan Doty

Henry Clay Keene

David W. Rosendin

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

PROSECUTE

ACTUS REUS

SELF-DEFENSE

SELF-INCRIMINATION

SEARCH WARRANT

LINEUP

IMPEACH

SENTENCE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Doe v. State

Phillips v. State

State v. Galbraith

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details