Milldale Construction Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm


Includes: Construction Contracts, Construction Liens, Housing & Construction Defects

Gregory A. Thompson

Construction, Litigation, Personal Injury, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  50 Years

Gregory Allen Thompson

Construction, Litigation, Child Custody, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  50 Years

Christopher Gino Ciancanelli

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  15 Years

Christopher Ciancanelli

Litigation, Merger & Acquisition, Employee Rights, Construction
Status:  In Good Standing           

Richard M Krezel

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  55 Years

Daniel Roger Labrecque

Motor Vehicle, Construction, Premises Liability, Products Liability
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  14 Years

Miruna Cristiana Popescu Voiculescu

Construction
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  12 Years

Matthew A. Lucarelli

Construction, Personal Injury, Car Accident, Accident & Injury
Status:  In Good Standing           

Ashley Bertsch

Construction
Status:  In Good Standing           

Owen Russell Firestone

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  9 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Milldale Construction Lawyers and Milldale Construction Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Real Estate areas including Timeshare, Eminent Domain, Foreclosure, Land Use & Zoning, Landlord-Tenant and Other Real Estate attorneys.

LEGAL TERMS

BEQUEST

The legal term for personal property (anything but real estate) left in a will.

JOINT TENANCY

A way for two or more people to share ownership of real estate or other property. When two or more people own property as joint tenants and one owner dies, the ... (more...)
A way for two or more people to share ownership of real estate or other property. When two or more people own property as joint tenants and one owner dies, the other owners automatically own the deceased owner's share. For example, if a parent and child own a house as joint tenants and the parent dies, the child automatically becomes full owner. Because of this right of survivorship, no will is required to transfer the property; it goes directly to the surviving joint tenants without the delay and costs of probate.

DOMINANT TENEMENT

Property that carries a right to use a portion of a neighboring property. For example, property that benefits from a beach access trail across another property ... (more...)
Property that carries a right to use a portion of a neighboring property. For example, property that benefits from a beach access trail across another property is the dominant tenement.

OFFENSIVE COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL

A doctrine that prevents a defendant from re-litigating an issue after it has been lost. For example, if your neighbor sues you for putting up a fence on his la... (more...)
A doctrine that prevents a defendant from re-litigating an issue after it has been lost. For example, if your neighbor sues you for putting up a fence on his land and the court rules that your fence extends beyond your property line, you can't later file your own lawsuit seeking a declaration that the property line is incorrectly drawn.

INTANGIBLE PROPERTY

Personal property that has no physical existence, such as stocks, bonds, bank notes, trade secrets, patents, copyrights and trademarks. Such 'untouchable' items... (more...)
Personal property that has no physical existence, such as stocks, bonds, bank notes, trade secrets, patents, copyrights and trademarks. Such 'untouchable' items may be represented by a certificate or license that fixes or approximates the value, but others (such as the goodwill or reputation of a business) are not easily valued or embodied in any instrument. Compare tangible property.

DEED IN LIEU (OF FORECLOSURE)

A means of escaping an overly burdenome mortgage. If a homeowner can't make the mortgage payments and can't find a buyer for the house, many lenders will accept... (more...)
A means of escaping an overly burdenome mortgage. If a homeowner can't make the mortgage payments and can't find a buyer for the house, many lenders will accept ownership of the property in place of the money owed on the mortgage. Even if the lender won't agree to accept the property, the homeowner can prepare a quitclaim deed that unilaterally transfers the homeowner's property rights to the lender.

COOLING-OFF RULE

A rule that allows you to cancel a contract within a specified time period (typically three days) after signing it. Federal cooling-off rules apply this three-d... (more...)
A rule that allows you to cancel a contract within a specified time period (typically three days) after signing it. Federal cooling-off rules apply this three-day grace period to sales made door-to-door and anywhere other than a seller's normal place of business, such as at a trade show. Another federal cooling-off rule lets you cancel a home improvement loan or second mortgage within three days of signing. Various states have cooling-off rules that sometimes apply even longer cancellation periods to specific types of sales, such as dancing lessons and timeshares.

EMINENT DOMAIN

The power of the federal or state government to take private property for a public purpose, even if the property owner objects. The Fifth Amendment to the Unite... (more...)
The power of the federal or state government to take private property for a public purpose, even if the property owner objects. The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution allows the government to take private property if the taking is for a public use and the owner is 'justly compensated' (usually, paid fair market value) for his or her loss. A public use is virtually anything that is sanctioned by a federal or state legislative body, but such uses may include roads, parks, reservoirs, schools, hospitals or other public buildings. Sometimes called condemnation, taking or expropriation.

TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY

Personal property that can be felt or touched. Examples include furniture, cars, jewelry and artwork. However, cash and checking accounts are not tangible perso... (more...)
Personal property that can be felt or touched. Examples include furniture, cars, jewelry and artwork. However, cash and checking accounts are not tangible personal property. The law is unsettled as to whether computer data is tangible personal property. Compare intangible property.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McCook v. Whitebirch Construction, LLC

John A. McCOOK v. WHITEBIRCH CONSTRUCTION, LLC, et al. Whitebirch Construction, LLC v. John A. McCook et al. Lenihan Lumber Company v. John A. McCook et al. ... Frank P. Cannatelli, in support of the petition. ... Richard J. Pascal and Laura B. Seder, Norwich, in ...

KOVACS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. WATER POLLUTION AND CONTROL AUTHORITY OF CITY OF NEW HAVEN

995 A.2d 639 (2010). 297 Conn. 912. KOVACS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. WATER POLLUTION AND CONTROL AUTHORITY OF the CITY OF NEW HAVEN. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Decided June 9, 2010. Steven B. Kaplan, Hartford, in support of the petition. ...

Rodriguez v. ED Construction, Inc.

Over the course of two years, the commissioner held nine formal hearings during which extensive evidence was introduced by both parties. In support of his claim that he was an employee of the defendant, the plaintiff testified that on the date of the accident, he was being paid $20 ...