Milpitas Criminal Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jo-Anna Nieves
About | Practice Areas
The Nieves Law Firm
505 14th St. Ste. 900 Oakland, CA 94612Â» view map
Criminal Defense
We Take The Criminal Out Of Criminal Defense

We are energetic, creative, and aggressive in our efforts to extricate you from your situation and help you get your life back on track.

800-681-5480
1. Jo-Anna Nieves Oakland, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 2011
  Florida State University J.D. 2011
2. AboutThe Nieves Law Firm
  When you are charged with a criminal offense, you need a strong, experienced, and committed advocate.
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert Cummings

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, White Collar Crime, Misdemeanor

The Law Offices of Robert G. Cummings is devoted to the defense of individuals and entities charged with or facing criminal prosecution. Mr. Cummings... (more)

CONTACT

800-965-6701

2033 Gateway Place, San Jose, CA 95110

Adam S. Rust

Employee Rights, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

3580 Wilshire Blvd, San Jose, CA 95125

Adrienne Yeung

Intellectual Property, Industry Specialties, Health Care, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

1055 E Brokaw Rd, Alviso, CA 95131

Alex Sol Friedland

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Business, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

10751 Ridgeview Ave, Alviso, CA 95127

Alison Yew

Immigration, Employment Discrimination, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1155 N 1St St, Alviso, CA 95112

Anthony David Flemmer

Criminal, Consumer Rights, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

2305 Bering Dr, Alviso, CA 95131

Arturo Hernandez

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

10050 Machado Ln, Alviso, CA 95127

Arturo Hernandez-Melendez

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

10050 Machado Ln, Alviso, CA 95127

Austin Thomas Jackson

Construction, Dispute Resolution, Criminal, Contract

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

1754 Technology Dr, Alviso, CA 95110

Beth Maureen Kendall Wright

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

2305 Bering Dr, Alviso, CA 95131

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

BAIL BOND

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear... (more...)

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear for a court hearing, the judge can issue a warrant for his arrest and threaten to 'forfeit,' or keep, the money if the defendant doesn't appear soon. Usually, the bondsman will look for the defendant and bring him back, forcefully if necessary, in order to avoid losing the bail money.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Albillar

... Code, Â§Â§ 261, subd. (a)(2), 264.1), forcible sexual penetration while acting in concert (id., Â§Â§ 289, subd. (a)(1), 264.1), and active participation in a criminal street gang (id., Â§ 186.22, subd. (a)). The jury further found that the sex ...

In re Lawrence

... 1189 Carrie L. Hempel, Michael J. Brennan and Heidi L. Rummel for Petitioner Sandra Davis Lawrence. Munger, Tolles & Olson, Blanca F. Young and Hailyn J. Chen for Stanford Criminal Justice Center as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner Sandra Davis Lawrence. ...

People v. Vazquez

... (b)-(d)), and that he committed the murder for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in association with a criminal street gang (Â§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C)). Appellant was sentenced to a total term in state prison of 50 years to life. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Milpitas Criminal Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

The Nieves Law Firm

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert Cummings

Adam S. Rust

Adrienne Yeung

Alex Sol Friedland

Alison Yew

Anthony David Flemmer

Arturo Hernandez

Arturo Hernandez-Melendez

Austin Thomas Jackson

Beth Maureen Kendall Wright

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTENTIONAL TORT

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

HUNG JURY

INTERROGATION

CORPUS DELECTI

BURDEN OF PROOF

DIRECTED VERDICT

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

BAIL BOND

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Albillar

In re Lawrence

People v. Vazquez

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details