Nordheim DUI-DWI Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Robert Jones
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Robert R. Jones III
2411 Emancipation Ave, Suite 202, Houston, TX 77004Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Expert Representation for Reasonable Rates

If you need representation, call me 24/7.

800-883-8760
1. Robert Jones San Antonio, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 2014
  South Texas College of Law J.D. 2011
2. AboutLaw Office of Robert R. Jones III
  Call me 24/7--Reasonable Rates
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Nordheim DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Nordheim Criminal lawyers.

Alger H. Kendall

Commercial Real Estate, Wills, Estate, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 58 Years

CONTACT

110E Crews Ave, Karnes City, TX 78118

David Korach Chapman

Other, State Appellate Practice, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

Karnes City, TX 78118

Terence Joseph Breen

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Goliad, TX 77963

Robert C. Lassmann

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

307 N Gonzales St, Cuero, TX 77954

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

ACCESSORY

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An acces... (more...)

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An accessory is usually not physically present during the crime. For example, hiding a robber who is being sought by the police might make you an 'accessory after the fact' to a robbery. Compare accomplice.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Amador v. State

... We reverse. 874 The Controversy [1]. On June 24, 2003, an assistant district attorney in Montgomery County presented an information in the trial court charging appellant with misdemeanor driving while intoxicated (DWI). The ...

Peavey v. State

... At the penalty stage of the trial, appellant pleaded "true" to the three prior felony convictions alleged for the enhancement of punishment, including: a felony driving while intoxicated (DWI) conviction in 2003 in the same district court; convictions for possession of a controlled ...

Brown v. State

... Brown was placed in custody and charged with DWI-Misdemeanor Repetition. ... 2000). B. Applicable Law. Under Texas law, a person commits DWI "if the person is intoxicated while operating a motor vehicle in a public place." Tex. Penal Code Ann. Â§ 49.04 (Vernon 2008). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Nordheim DUI-DWI Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Robert R. Jones III

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Alger H. Kendall

David Korach Chapman

Terence Joseph Breen

Robert C. Lassmann

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

IMPRISON

ACCOMPLICE

INSANITY

CAPITAL CASE

JURY NULLIFICATION

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

ACCESSORY

SPECIFIC INTENT

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Amador v. State

Peavey v. State

Brown v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details