Oak Forest DUI-DWI Lawyer, Illinois, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory R. LaPapa
About | Practice Areas
LaPapa Law Group
10704 S Western Ave Chicago, IL 60643» view map
Accident & Injury Law, Criminal Defense
Changing Lives One Case At A Time

At LaPapa Law Group, we understand that life doesn’t always go as planned. We have the knowledge and experience needed to competently represent you in court.

800-694-2681
1. Gregory R. LaPapa Chicago, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 1982
  DePaul University J.D. 1982
2. AboutLaPapa Law Group
  We have been in practice for over 30 years.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law, Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Camille M. Hicks

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Business, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

4749 Lincoln Mall Dr, Matteson, IL 60443

David William Glover

DUI-DWI, Traffic, Divorce, Mesothelioma

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

19065 Hickory Creek Dr, Mokena, IL 60448

David Glover

DUI-DWI, Traffic, Divorce, Mesothelioma

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

19065 Hickory Creek Dr, Mokena, IL 60448

Scott David Dillner

Personal Injury, Workers' Compensation, DUI-DWI, Estate Planning

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

16231 Wausau Ave, South Holland, IL 60473

John Eannace

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

11950 South Harlem Avenue, Palos Heights, IL 60463

John Jay Eannace

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

11950 South Harlem Avenue, Palos Heights, IL 60463

Jason Danielian

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Transactions

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

Flossmoor, IL 60430

Jason Frank Danielian

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Transactions

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

Flossmoor, IL 60430

Timothy Ehlers

Estate Planning, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

9991 West 191St Street, Mokena, IL 60448

Joseph A. Parisi

Traffic, Family Law, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

8632 W 103Rd St, Palos Hills, IL 60465

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Van Schoyck

... objection, dismissed the three citations and recharged defendant, in an information, with driving with a blood-alcohol content over 0.08, noting in the charge the existence of the sentence-enhancing factor (driving on a revoked license), which elevated the DUI offense to ...

People v. Gonzalez

... begin there. Prior to January 1, 2006, section 11-501 provided that driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUI) constituted aggravated DUI in six instances, none of which are relevant to further discussion. However, section ...

People v. Prouty

... After a bench trial, defendant, Edmund T. Prouty, was convicted of aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11 â€” 501(d)(1)(A) (West 2006)). ... The indictment stated that aggravated DUI was a Class 2 felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Oak Forest DUI-DWI Lawyer, Illinois, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

LaPapa Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Camille M. Hicks

David William Glover

David Glover

Scott David Dillner

John Eannace

John Jay Eannace

Jason Danielian

Jason Frank Danielian

Timothy Ehlers

Joseph A. Parisi

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

PLEA BARGAIN

SELF-INCRIMINATION

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

HOT PURSUIT

DIRECTED VERDICT

HOMICIDE

MOTION IN LIMINE

CRIMINAL INSANITY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Van Schoyck

People v. Gonzalez

People v. Prouty

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details