Oliveburg Misdemeanor Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Oliveburg Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Oliveburg Criminal lawyers.

Joseph Drew Ryan

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal

Joseph Drew Ryan is a practicing lawyer in Pennsylvania handling criminal defense matters.

CONTACT

814-653-2042

449 E Main St, Reynoldsville, PA 15851

Gregory Dale Sobol

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

379 Main Street, Brookville, PA 15825

Jay Patrick Lundy

Real Estate, Government, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

219 E Union St, Punxsutawney, PA 15767

Franklin Thomas Stockdale

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

Punxsutawney, PA 15767

David L. Young

Other, Government, Criminal, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

306 W Mahoning St, Punxsutawney, PA 15767

David Aloysius Grady

Criminal

Status: Suspended Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

Reynoldsville, PA 15851

Gregory M Bazylak

Traffic, Criminal, Personal Injury, Legal Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

2 Sylvania St, Brookville, PA 15825

John C. Dennison

Real Estate, Government, Estate, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

293 Main St, Brookville, PA 15825

Robbie Martin Taylor

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

194 Main St, Brookville, PA 15825

John Mark Ingros

Real Estate, Government, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

200 Main Street, Brookville, PA 15825

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Oliveburg Misdemeanor Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Joseph Drew Ryan

Gregory Dale Sobol

Jay Patrick Lundy

Franklin Thomas Stockdale

David L. Young

David Aloysius Grady

Gregory M Bazylak

John C. Dennison

Robbie Martin Taylor

John Mark Ingros

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BURGLARY

CHARGE

NOLO CONTENDERE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

INFORMED CONSENT

PLEA BARGAIN

SELF-DEFENSE

HABEAS CORPUS

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details