Onalaska White Collar Crime Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Cooper
About | Services
The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.
848 Brickell Avenue Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131Â» view map
DWI/DUI, Drug Trafficking, Felony
Nationally Ranked Top 40 Under 40

With Richard L. Cooper you can expect a trusted confidant who will work diligently to fully understand your case and determine a road map to help you regain control of your life.

800-756-2781
1. Richard L. Cooper Miami, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 2011
  Nova Southeastern University, J.D.
2. AboutMiami Attorney at Law
  Covering all Felonies and Misdemeanors including drugs, theft, DUI, probation violations, and much more.
3. ServicesCriminal Defense
  We know that being faced with a serious criminal charge is frightening.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Video
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Onalaska White Collar Crime lawyer.
Below are all Onalaska Criminal lawyers.

David B. Russell

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

505 King Street, La Crosse, WI 54602

Mark R. McCabe

Litigation, Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

505 King Street, La Crosse, WI 54602

James W. Richgels

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Landlord-Tenant

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

201 Main St, La Crosse, WI 54601

Christopher Allan Doerfler

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

125 N 4Th St, La Crosse, WI 54601

William David Bolte

Wills & Probate, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Consumer Protection

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

505 King St, La Crosse, WI 54602

Peter B. Kisken

Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

N2277 Pammel Pass, La Crosse, WI 54601

Kathryn S. Polsley

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

2102 Esther Dr, Onalaska, WI 54650

Timothy John Corrigan

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

4567 Settlers Trail, West Salem, WI 54669

Austin D. Auleta

Family Law, Criminal, Credit & Debt

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

750 3Rd Street N., La Crosse, WI 54602

Keith A. Belzer

Mass Torts, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

300 2Nd St N, La Crosse, WI 54601

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

MISDEMEANOR

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk d... (more...)

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk driving and leaving the scene of an accident are all common misdemeanors.

CRIME

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defin... (more...)

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defined by Congress and state legislatures.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Onalaska White Collar Crime Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

David B. Russell

Mark R. McCabe

James W. Richgels

Christopher Allan Doerfler

William David Bolte

Peter B. Kisken

Kathryn S. Polsley

Timothy John Corrigan

Austin D. Auleta

Keith A. Belzer

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACTUS REUS

FEDERAL COURT

CRIMINAL INSANITY

CAPITAL CASE

MISDEMEANOR

CRIME

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

INFORMED CONSENT

JURY

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details