Paulsboro Juvenile Law Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

George Vahn
About | Practice Areas
Vahn Law
27 Dearborn Ave. #175 Browns Mills, NJ 08015» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Your Case Matters To Us

You have Rights; we exist to make certain those Rights are not violated and that you are afforded every opportunity to obtain a fair legal result.

800-708-3561
1. George Vahn Browns Mills, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 2005
  Rutgers University J.D. 2005
2. AboutVahn Law
  New Jersey's Legal Defense
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert R. Simons

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Traffic, Accident & Injury, Municipal, Juvenile Law

Unmatched Knowledge and Experience

Attorney Robert R. Simons began his legal career as a prosecutor for the Camden County Prosecutor's Office. While working in the Camden County Prosecu... (more)

CONTACT

800-798-5080

126 White Horse Pike, Haddon Heights, NJ 08035

Joseph J. Urban

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2091 Springdale Road, Cherry Hill, NJ 08003

Jeffrey Gold

Municipal, Government, Criminal, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

111 White Horse Pike, Haddon Heights, NJ 08035

Jeffrey S. Hark

Juvenile Law, Litigation, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

1101 Rte 70 W, Cherry Hill, NJ 08002

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Paulsboro Juvenile Law Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm

Vahn Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert R. Simons

Joseph J. Urban

Jeffrey Gold

Jeffrey S. Hark

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

EXPUNGE

BURDEN OF PROOF

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

INSANITY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

LINEUP

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

EAVESDROPPING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Read

Henry v. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES

State v. Miller

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details