Pearl Criminal Lawyer, Mississippi, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Heather Aby
About | Practice Areas
Abby Law, PLLC
403 B Towne Center Blvd Suite 102 Ridgeland, MS 39157» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Get the Legal Support You Need

If you need an experienced litigation attorney, look no further than Aby Law, PLLC. We are a trusted general practice law firm in Ridgeland, MS.

800-953-2840
1. Heather Aby Ridgeland, MS
  Attorney at Law- MS, 2002
  Mississippi College School of Law, J.D. 2002
2. AboutAby Law, PLLC
  Get the Legal Support You Need
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Gretchen Leigh Zmitrovich

White Collar Crime, Natural Resources, Commercial Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

Jackson, MS 39225

Chokwe Lumumba

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

Jackson, MS 39286

Joseph M Hollomon

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

107 N State St, Jackson, MS 39225

Jennifer Paige Wilkins

Products Liability, DUI-DWI, Wrongful Death, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

455 E Capitol St, Jackson, MS 39201

Drew M Martin

Immigration, Wills & Probate, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

401 Mississippi St, Jackson, MS 39205

Jeanine Michele Carafello

Estate, Family Law, Criminal, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1911 Dunbarton Dr, Jackson, MS 39216

Bryant Donlevy Guy

Accident & Injury, Bankruptcy, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

210 E Capitol Street, Jackson, MS 39286

Thomas V Alonzo

Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury, Wrongful Death

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

2906 N State St, Jackson, MS 39216

C Stevens Seale

Criminal, Family Law, Litigation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

401 E Capitol St, Jackson, MS 39201

Curt Crowley

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

964 North Jefferson Street, Jackson, MS 39202

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Coleman v. State

... 4. Coleman is only partially correct. Trotter does state that a criminal defendant who pleads guilty may challenge the sentence that results from the guilty plea on direct appeal, even though he or she may not challenge the conviction that results from a guilty plea. ...

Burrough v. State

... that night outside Bill Ashmore's Wrecker Service establishment by a deputy from the Grenada County Sheriff's Office who had been notified by the Mississippi Highway Patrol that two of its patrolmen had detained Burrough at that location on suspicion of criminal activity at the ...

Jordan v. State

... doubt. See, eg, Miller v. State, 980 So.2d 927, 929 (Miss.2008) (noting that the burden of proof for criminal cases is proof beyond a reasonable doubt). A. Identification of the Shooter and the Motion for Directed Verdict. Â¶ 24. Jordan ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Pearl Criminal Lawyer, Mississippi, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Abby Law, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Gretchen Leigh Zmitrovich

Chokwe Lumumba

Joseph M Hollomon

Jennifer Paige Wilkins

Drew M Martin

Jeanine Michele Carafello

Bryant Donlevy Guy

Thomas V Alonzo

C Stevens Seale

Curt Crowley

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INFORMED CONSENT

ACTUS REUS

SELF-DEFENSE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

IMPRISON

SPECIFIC INTENT

DIRECTED VERDICT

VENIREMEN

EAVESDROPPING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Coleman v. State

Burrough v. State

Jordan v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details