Pleasant Plain Trusts Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Ronald Lasko
About | Practice Areas
R. Lasko Co. LPA, LLC
1406 W 6th St STE 200, Cleveland, OH 44113» view map
Business, Estate, Real Estate, Employment
Competent Legal Representation

Let R. Lasko Co. LPA, LLC handle all your legal needs today!

216-574-2602
1. Ronald Lasko Cleveland, OH
  Attorney at Law, OH
  Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, J.D. 1976
2. AboutR. Lasko Co. LPA, LLC
  Competent Legal Representation
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Business Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Joanna Montserrat Solozabal

Trusts, Wills

Status: Inactive Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

1255 Ridgewood Dr, Camp Dennison, OH 45140

Todd Parker Ashby

Real Estate, Trusts, Estate, Estate Planning

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1221 Ridgewood Dr, Camp Dennison, OH 45140

Christopher Dennis Longwell

Construction, Trusts, Employee Rights, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

10663 Loveland Madeira Rd, Loveland, OH 45140

Anne E. Krehbiel

Power of Attorney, Wills & Probate, Trusts, Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

45 East Mulberry Street, Lebanon, OH 45036

Thomas Edward Donnellon

Real Estate, Trusts, Estate Planning, Elder Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

9079 Montgomery Rd, Loveland, OH 45242

Barry Herbert Zimmer

Trusts, Estate Planning, Estate, Elder Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

9825 Kenwood Road, Loveland, OH 45242

Kenneth E. Peller

Wills, Trusts, Family Law, Divorce

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

11230 Cornell Park Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45242

David Joseph Bross

Litigation, Trusts, Estate Planning, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

9999 Carver Road, Loveland, OH 45242

Laura Lynn Drake

Trusts, Estate, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Cincinnati, OH 45242

Lorelei Bolohan

Trusts

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

7755 Montgomery Road, Cincinnati, OH 45236

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

STATUTORY SHARE

The portion of a deceased person's estate that a spouse is entitled to claim under state law. The statutory share is usually one-third or one-half of the deceas... (more...)

The portion of a deceased person's estate that a spouse is entitled to claim under state law. The statutory share is usually one-third or one-half of the deceased spouse's property, but in some states the exact amount of the spouse's share depends on whether or not the couple has young children and, in a few states, on how long the couple was married. In most states, if the deceased spouse left a will, the surviving spouse must choose either what the will provides or the statutory share. Sometimes the statutory share is known by its more arcane legal name, dower and curtesy, or as a forced or elective share.

ANCILLARY PROBATE

A probate proceeding conducted in a different state from the one the deceased person resided in at the time of death. Usually, ancillary probate proceedings are... (more...)

A probate proceeding conducted in a different state from the one the deceased person resided in at the time of death. Usually, ancillary probate proceedings are necessary if the deceased person owned real estate in another state.

FAMILY POT TRUST

See pot trust.

DOWER AND CURTESY

A surviving spouse's right to receive a set portion of the deceased spouse's estate -- usually one-third to one-half. Dower (not to be confused with a 'dowry') ... (more...)

A surviving spouse's right to receive a set portion of the deceased spouse's estate -- usually one-third to one-half. Dower (not to be confused with a 'dowry') refers to the portion to which a surviving wife is entitled, while curtesy refers to what a man may claim. Until recently, these amounts differed in a number of states. However, because discrimination on the basis of sex is now illegal in most cases, most states have abolished dower and curtesy and generally provide the same benefits regardless of sex -- and this amount is often known simply as the statutory share. Under certain circumstances, a living spouse may not be able to sell or convey property that is subject to the other spouse's dower and curtesy or statutory share rights.

QDOT TRUST

A trust used to postpone estate tax when more than the amount of the personal federal estate tax exemption is left to a non-U.S. citizen spouse by the other spo... (more...)

A trust used to postpone estate tax when more than the amount of the personal federal estate tax exemption is left to a non-U.S. citizen spouse by the other spouse. QDOT stands for qualified domestic trust.

CONTINGENT BENEFICIARY

1) An alternate beneficiary named in a will, trust or other document. 2) Any person entitled to property under a will if one or more prior conditions are satisf... (more...)

1) An alternate beneficiary named in a will, trust or other document. 2) Any person entitled to property under a will if one or more prior conditions are satisfied. For example, if Fred is entitled to take property under a will only if he's married at the time of the will maker's death, Fred is a contingent beneficiary. Similarly, if Ellen is named to receive a house only in the event her mother, who has been named to live in the house, moves out of it, Ellen is a contingent beneficiary.

PER STIRPES

Under a will, a method of determining who inherits property when a joint beneficiary has died before the willmaker, leaving living children of his or her own. F... (more...)

Under a will, a method of determining who inherits property when a joint beneficiary has died before the willmaker, leaving living children of his or her own. For example, Fred leaves his house jointly to his son Alan and his daughter Julie. But Alan dies before Fred, leaving two young children. If Fred's will states that heirs of a deceased beneficiary are to receive the property 'per stirpes,' Julie will receive one-half of the property, and Alan's two children will share his half in equal shares (through Alan by right of representation). If, on the other hand, Fred's will states that the property is to be divided per capita, Julie and the two grandchildren will each take a third.

GRANT DEED

A deed containing an implied promise that the person transfering the property actually owns the title and that it is not encumbered in any way, except as descri... (more...)

A deed containing an implied promise that the person transfering the property actually owns the title and that it is not encumbered in any way, except as described in the deed. This is the most commonly used type of deed. Compare quitclaim deed.

RULE AGAINST PERPETUITIES

An exceedingly complex legal doctrine that limits the amount of time that property can be controlled after death by a person's instructions in a will. For examp... (more...)

An exceedingly complex legal doctrine that limits the amount of time that property can be controlled after death by a person's instructions in a will. For example, a person would not be allowed to leave property to her husband for his life, then to her children for their lives, then to her grandchildren. The gift would potentially go to the grandchildren at a point too remote in time.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Pack v. Osborn

... Alternatively, the trustee requested that the trust be reformed to meet the current statutory and regulatory standards for trusts that are noncountable resources. [1]. ... Restatement of the Law 2d, Trusts (1959), Section 2, comment f. ...

Bank One Trust Co., NA v. Scherer

... Roger died in 1982. Pursuant to the trust agreement, Bank One was to form three trusts: one for Roger's son, Ronald; one for Roger's daughter, Linda Scherer Talbott; and one for Roger's surviving spouse, Betty J. Scherer. The ...

Kormanik v. Cooper

... {Â¶ 2} These appeals involve cases in which Kormanik, acting as appointed guardian for two individuals who were found to be incompetent, filed actions in the probate court seeking to have qualifying pooled special-needs trusts established, pursuant to Section 1396p(d)(4)(C ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Pleasant Plain Trusts Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

R. Lasko Co. LPA, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Joanna Montserrat Solozabal

Todd Parker Ashby

Christopher Dennis Longwell

Anne E. Krehbiel

Thomas Edward Donnellon

Barry Herbert Zimmer

Kenneth E. Peller

David Joseph Bross

Laura Lynn Drake

Lorelei Bolohan

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

STATUTORY SHARE

ANCILLARY PROBATE

FAMILY POT TRUST

DOWER AND CURTESY

QDOT TRUST

CONTINGENT BENEFICIARY

PER STIRPES

GRANT DEED

RULE AGAINST PERPETUITIES

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Pack v. Osborn

Bank One Trust Co., NA v. Scherer

Kormanik v. Cooper

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details