Poole Intellectual Property Lawyer, Kentucky

Sponsored Law Firm


John Edward Hudson

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Joel C Rich

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Amealia R Zachary

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Tommy J Fridy

Land Use & Zoning, Credit & Debt, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy & Debt
Status:  In Good Standing           

Daniel Mark Heady

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Carla Rene Williams

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Kenton Jay Watson

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

James Edwin Gentry

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Lawyer.com can help you easily and quickly find Poole Intellectual Property Lawyers and Poole Intellectual Property Law Firms. Refine your search by specific Intellectual Property practice areas such as Copyright, International Intellectual Property, Patent and Trademark matters.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Papa John's Intern., Inc. v. McCoy

... easily transferable to the franchise relationship." [26] After considering the fact that a franchise is a commercial arrangement between two businesses and the unique aspects of such an arrangement—franchisee authorized to use the franchisor's intellectual property and brand ...

Mickler v. Mickler

... $111,809.03 for her share in Andrew's medical practice, half the proceeds from the sale of the marital residence and another piece of property, her car ... The obvious purpose of the [relevant Pennsylvania statute] is to protect earnings produced by physical or intellectual effort. . . . ...

Gaskill v. Robbins

... It may not be acquired by the mere expenditure of money. It is simply an intellectual achievement that may potentially assist in the future acquisition of property ... [. Id. at 331 (quoting Mahoney v. Mahoney, 182 NJSuper. 598, 442 A.2d 1062, 1066 (1982)). ...