Putnam County, WV DUI-DWI Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Claude S. Smith, III
About | Practice Areas
The Law Offices of Claude S. Smith III
805 Bigley Avenue Charleston, WV 25302» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Working With Clients One On One

As your attorney, I will make sure you know that I am here for you. I will keep you updated on your case as it progresses.

800-936-8471
1. Claude S. Smith, III Charleston, WV
  Attorney at Law - WV, 1992
  University of Houston J.D. 1989
2. AboutThe Law Offices of Claude S. Smith III
  Working With Clients One On One
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Putnam DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Putnam lawyers.

Shawn D. Bayliss

Family Law, Bad Faith Insurance, Traffic, Divorce

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3554 Teays Valley Road, Hurricane, WV 25526

Maggie K. Wall

Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3950 Teays Valley Road, Hurricane, WV 25526

Cynthia E. Evans

Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

380 Mandolin Dr, Buffalo, WV 25033

Paul S. Atkins

Traffic, Immigration, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

Buffalo, WV 25033

Amanda Bree Whipp Ogle

Collection

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

105 River Vista Drive, Buffalo, WV 25033

M. Rosalee Juba-Plumley

Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

Eleanor, WV 25070

Joseph P. Whittington

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

Eleanor, WV 25070

Richard J. Lindroth

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

Eleanor, WV 25070

Joseph Adam Holley

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

64 Bedford Ct, Fraziers Bottom, WV 25082

Toni Harvey Takarsh

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

141 Florence Farley Ln, Fraziers Bottom, WV 25082

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BOOKING

A quaint phrase that refers to the recording of an arrested person's name, age, address and reason for arrest when that person is brought to jail and placed beh... (more...)

A quaint phrase that refers to the recording of an arrested person's name, age, address and reason for arrest when that person is brought to jail and placed behind bars. Nowadays, the book is likely to be a computer. Usually, a mug shot and fingerprints are taken, and the arrestee's clothing and personal effects are inventoried and stored.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Lowe v. Cicchirillo

... W.Va.Code Â§ 17C-5A-1a(a)(1994) does not require that a police officer actually see or observe a person move, drive, or operate a motor vehicle while the officer is physically present before the officer can charge that person with DUI under this statute, so long as all the ...

Carpenter v. Cicchirillo

... By that order, the circuit court reversed a DMV order that revoked the driver's license of the petitioner below and appellee herein, Jeffrey Carpenter (hereinafter "Mr. Carpenter"), for driving under the influence of alcohol (hereinafter "DUI"). ...

Cain v. DIV. OF MOTOR VEHICLES

... According to the Commissioner, the trial court erred in ruling that the arresting officer lacked the predicate basis for concluding that a crime had been committed at the time of Mr. Cain's arrest for driving under the influence ("DUI"). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Putnam County, WV DUI-DWI Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Claude S. Smith III

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Shawn D. Bayliss

Maggie K. Wall

Cynthia E. Evans

Paul S. Atkins

Amanda Bree Whipp Ogle

M. Rosalee Juba-Plumley

Joseph P. Whittington

Richard J. Lindroth

Joseph Adam Holley

Toni Harvey Takarsh

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BOOKING

MENS REA

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SEARCH WARRANT

INFORMED CONSENT

CRIMINAL LAW

SPECIFIC INTENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Lowe v. Cicchirillo

Carpenter v. Cicchirillo

Cain v. DIV. OF MOTOR VEHICLES

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details