- Iowa / Rake / Rake Adoption
Rake Adoption Lawyer, Iowa
Not enough matches for Rake Adoption lawyer.
Below are all Rake Divorce & Family Law lawyers.
SPONSORED LAWYERS
1-2 of 2 matches. Page 1 of 1
Martin W. Peterson
Wills & Probate, Estate Planning, Family Law, Business Organization
Status: Deceased Licensed: 56 Years
6 East State Street, Algona, IA 50511
Profile LAWPOINTS™35/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
Mark Allen Young
Commercial Real Estate, Family Law, Adoption, Criminal
Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years
Mason City, IA 50402
Profile LAWPOINTS™22/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
TIPS
Easily find Rake Adoption Lawyers and Rake Adoption Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Divorce & Family Law areas including Child Custody, Child Support, Divorce and Family Law attorneys.
LEGAL TERMS
DILUTION
A situation in which a famous trademark or service mark is used in a context in which the mark's reputation for quality is tarnished or its distinction is blurr... (more...)
A situation in which a famous trademark or service mark is used in a context in which the mark's reputation for quality is tarnished or its distinction is blurred. In this case, trademark infringement exists even though there is no likelihood of customer confusion, which is usually required in cases of trademark infringement. For example, the use of the word Candyland for a pornographic site on the Internet was ruled to dilute the reputation of the Candyland mark for the well-known children's game, even though the traditional basis for trademark infringement (probable customer confusion) wasn't an issue.
POT TRUST
A trust for children in which the trustee decides how to spend money on each child, taking money out of the trust to meet each child's specific needs. One impor... (more...)
A trust for children in which the trustee decides how to spend money on each child, taking money out of the trust to meet each child's specific needs. One important advantage of a pot trust over separate trusts is that it allows the trustee to provide for one child's unforeseen need, such as a medical emergency. But a pot trust can also make the trustee's life difficult by requiring choices about disbursing funds to the various children. A pot trust ends when the youngest child reaches a certain age, usually 18 or 21.
SURVIVORS BENEFITS
An amount of money available to the surviving spouse and minor or disabled children of a deceased worker who qualified for Social Security retirement or disabil... (more...)
An amount of money available to the surviving spouse and minor or disabled children of a deceased worker who qualified for Social Security retirement or disability benefits.
COMMON LAW MARRIAGE
In some states, a type of marriage in which couples can become legally married by living together for a long period of time, representing themselves as a marrie... (more...)
In some states, a type of marriage in which couples can become legally married by living together for a long period of time, representing themselves as a married couple and intending to be married. Contrary to popular belief, the couple must intend to be married and act as though they are for a common law marriage to take effect -- merely living together for a long time won't do it.
PREMARITAL AGREEMENT
An agreement made by a couple before marriage that controls certain aspects of their relationship, usually the management and ownership of property, and sometim... (more...)
An agreement made by a couple before marriage that controls certain aspects of their relationship, usually the management and ownership of property, and sometimes whether alimony will be paid if the couple later divorces. Courts usually honor premarital agreements unless one person shows that the agreement was likely to promote divorce, was written with the intention of divorcing or was entered into unfairly. A premarital agreement may also be known as a 'prenuptial agreement.'
CONFINEMENT IN PRISON
In most states with fault divorce, grounds for a spouse not in prison to obtain a fault divorce if the other spouse has been imprisoned for a certain number of ... (more...)
In most states with fault divorce, grounds for a spouse not in prison to obtain a fault divorce if the other spouse has been imprisoned for a certain number of years.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
An order from a judge that directs a party to come to court and convince the judge why she shouldn't grant an action proposed by the other side or by the judge ... (more...)
An order from a judge that directs a party to come to court and convince the judge why she shouldn't grant an action proposed by the other side or by the judge on her own (sua sponte). For example, in a divorce, at the request of one parent a judge might issue an order directing the other parent to appear in court on a particular date and time to show cause why the first parent should not be given sole physical custody of the children. Although it would seem that the person receiving an order to show cause is at a procedural disadvantage--she, after all, is the one who is told to come up with a convincing reason why the judge shouldn't order something--both sides normally have an equal chance to convince the judge to rule in their favor.
IRREMEDIABLE OR IRRETRIEVABLE BREAKDOWN
The situation that occurs in a marriage when one spouse refuses to live with the other and will not work toward reconciliation. In a number of states, irremedia... (more...)
The situation that occurs in a marriage when one spouse refuses to live with the other and will not work toward reconciliation. In a number of states, irremediable breakdown is the accepted ground for a no-fault divorce. As a practical matter, courts seldom, if ever, inquire into whether the marriage has actually broken down, and routinely grant a divorce as long as the party seeking the divorce says the marriage has fallen apart. Compare incompatibility; irreconcilable differences.
INJUNCTION
A court decision that is intended to prevent harm--often irreparable harm--as distinguished from most court decisions, which are designed to provide a remedy fo... (more...)
A court decision that is intended to prevent harm--often irreparable harm--as distinguished from most court decisions, which are designed to provide a remedy for harm that has already occurred. Injunctions are orders that one side refrain from or stop certain actions, such as an order that an abusive spouse stay away from the other spouse or that a logging company not cut down first-growth trees. Injunctions can be temporary, pending a consideration of the issue later at trial (these are called interlocutory decrees or preliminary injunctions). Judges can also issue permanent injunctions at the end of trials, in which a party may be permanently prohibited from engaging in some conduct--for example, infringing a copyright or trademark or making use of illegally obtained trade secrets. Although most injunctions order a party not to do something, occasionally a court will issue a 'mandatory injunction' to order a party to carry out a positive act--for example, return stolen computer code.
SAMPLE LEGAL CASES
Schott v. Schott
... The court found Heather's adoptions of the children were contrary to Iowa's adoption
statute and therefore invalid. ... The district court held Heather's adoptions of Caleb and
Tori were contrary to Iowa's adoption statute and therefore invalid. ...
In re NNE
... Shannon, an Iowa resident, is a member of a federally recognized Indian tribe located in California.
She became pregnant and decided to give the child up for adoption. ... Shannon decided she was
unable to care for an additional child and chose to give the child up for adoption. ...
Nevadacare v. Department of Human Services
... Id. In this case, NevadaCare urges us to apply a more exacting standard when
reviewing the district court's judgment, due to the district court's alleged wholesale
adoption of DHS's proposed findings of fact and legal conclusions. ...
FILTER BY:
- Free Consultation
- Male
- Female
- Suspended
PRACTICE AREAS
- Accident & Injury
- Bankruptcy & Debt
- Business
- Civil & Human Rights
- Consumer Rights
- Criminal
- Divorce & Family Law
- Adoption
- -Child Custody
- -Guardianships & Conservatorships
- -Custody & Visitation
- -Child Support
- -Divorce
- -Alimony & Spousal Support
- -Family Law
- -Collaborative Law
- -Domestic Violence & Neglect
- -Paternity
- -Prenuptial Agreements
- Employment
- Environmental Law
- Estate
- Government
- Health Care
- Immigration
- Industry Specialties
- Intellectual Property
- International
- Lawsuit & Dispute
- Mass Torts
- Motor Vehicle
- Real Estate
- Tax
- Other