Rayland Juvenile Law Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Sean Logue
Google+ | Contact Us
Sean Logue & Associates
200 First Avenue 3rd Floor #301A Pittsburgh, PA 15222 » view map
DUI, Sex Crimes, Drug Crimes, Expungements
Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day

Our lawyers bring a thorough understanding of criminal issues to help minimize the damage that a DUI charge can bring to our clients.

412-389-0805
1. Sean Logue Pittsburgh, PA
  Attorney At Law - Pennsylvania, 2008
  West Virginia, J.D. - 2007
2. Google+
  Visit us and follow on Google+ to interact on social media.
3. Contact UsEmail or Call 24/7
  Free initial consultation. Contact us today.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Rayland Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Rayland Criminal lawyers.

Steven Anthony Stickles

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Felony

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

500 Market St, Steubenville, OH 43952

John Jeffrey Mascio

Juvenile Law, Estate Planning, Family Law, Criminal, Wills & Probate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 59 Years

CONTACT

424 Market St, Steubenville, OH 43952

John Joseph Mascio

Juvenile Law, Estate, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 59 Years

CONTACT

424 Market St, Steubenville, OH 43952

Bernard Chill Battistel

Juvenile Law, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Collection

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

2021 Sunset Blvd, Steubenville, OH 43952

Frank Wesley Noble

Juvenile Law, Estate, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

2017 Sunset Blvd, Steubenville, OH 43952

Michelle Garcia Miller

Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

301 Market St, Steubenville, OH 43952

Samuel A. Pate

Juvenile Law, Litigation, Family Law, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

16001 State Route 7, Steubenville, OH 43952

Samuel Arthur Pate

Juvenile Law, Litigation, Family Law, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

16001 State Route 7, Steubenville, OH 43952

Bonnie Stewart

Trusts, Family Law, Employee Rights, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

320 Howard St, Bridgeport, OH 43912

Lindsey Marie Tomlan Ralston

Workers' Compensation, Employment, Litigation, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

108 E Main St, Saint Clairsville, OH 43950

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re AJS

... {Â¶ 1} This appeal presents two issues for our consideration: First, whether an order of a juvenile court denying ... We hold that the order of a juvenile court denying a motion for mandatory bindover bars the state from prosecuting a juvenile offender as an adult for a criminal offense. ...

State v. DH

... PFEIFER, J. Factual and Procedural Background. {Â¶ 1} On December 28, 2004, DH, a juvenile, fired a gun into a melee outside his friend Christopher Harris's home. Harris ... Juvenile Courts, the Sixth Amendment, and Due Process. {Â¶ 40 ...

In re LAB

... LANZINGER, J. {Â¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to determine whether Juv.R. 29 applies to probation revocation hearings in juvenile courts. We hold that it does. ... He was placed on juvenile probation. LAB appeared before the juvenile court a total of eight times. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Rayland Juvenile Law Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

Sean Logue & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Steven Anthony Stickles

John Jeffrey Mascio

John Joseph Mascio

Bernard Chill Battistel

Frank Wesley Noble

Michelle Garcia Miller

Samuel A. Pate

Samuel Arthur Pate

Bonnie Stewart

Lindsey Marie Tomlan Ralston

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

ARRAIGNMENT

ACCOMPLICE

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

JURY

INSANITY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SEARCH WARRANT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re AJS

State v. DH

In re LAB

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details